Claydon versus min till trial

First year with claydon last year and split some fields of 2nd wheat to trial it.

Half drilled with Weaving subdisc working 11 inches. 2 passes with power harrow. Weaving drill. Roll.
Half drilled direct with claydon with leading tine 4 inches. Roll. (No straw harrowing)

Six identical runs cut on one field with weights recorded on combine:
Claydon 2.16t 2.15t 2.09t
Min till 2.17t 2.14t 2.06t

Verdict was there was absolutely no appreciable difference between the two systems in yield and both doing over 4t/a in the fields drilled.

Will do some more this autumn on clean fields but to be honest with blackgrass pressure we will be returning back to the plough more.

Do agree I should not really call it min till. 2nd power harrow pass is more to help with the chopped straw incorporation to help to drill run as it is for seedbed preparation.
Still found it an interesting comparison as the drill covers as much ground a day with 155hp as the Weaving subdisc does with 200hp. Big savings to be made between systems with no apparent yield loss.
Also drilled 50% of osr with claydon and 50% with stocks units on subdisc.
One working at 6 inches and other 11 inches with no variation in yield. Claydon fields lovely and level in comparison and will drill all osr now on with it.
Not grown spring beans last year but will see if any difference between direct drilled versus ploughed and drilled next spring.
Being frowned upon by some people at using a claydon, zero till a step too far for me at moment. Not got the courage !!!