I thought that might be the case, the elbow @John1594 doesn't look as tight as the one on ours.One off a 35 won't fit, hence ours is welded
It started out at Gloucester Council and then went to Healaugh Farms where my dad worked. We bought it from them a year or so after dad came back to the family farm. It did all the loader work for about 10 years for up to 180 cattle.Not seen the parallel loader linkage on an older round mudguard model plus swing seat on the digger.
How old is the digger? And what exactly is it, we have a 203x , looks the same, except no parallel loaderCan you still get the 180 for the exhaust as pictured? Dobsons said not, but will a 35 one fit?View attachment 453422View attachment 453424View attachment 453426
Ha, you've forgotten you asked this before! Not sure on the exact age but it is definetly a 205. Loader is a 17, backhoe I believe is a 220. Its got the three pedal torque converter which is brill.How old is the digger? And what exactly is it, we have a 203x , looks the same, except no parallel loader
I thought there was one on here before, ours is a normal 6 speed box, 65 type back axle, same back actor, not parallel loaderHa, you've forgotten you asked this before! Not sure on the exact age but it is definetly a 205. Loader is a 17, backhoe I believe is a 220. Its got the three pedal torque converter which is brill.
Not seen the parallel loader linkage on an older round mudguard model plus swing seat on the digger.
The 1963 203 we had for years had a 220 detachable back hoe and a *07 front loader (can't remember exact nos) The three part actually had their own transfers defining the models. I think trading on the net that the loader and hoe in that era may have been designed (possibly built) by a 2nd company Davis. The loader on our one had a pressed steel look to it.Ha, you've forgotten you asked this before! Not sure on the exact age but it is definetly a 205. Loader is a 17, backhoe I believe is a 220. Its got the three pedal torque converter which is brill.