- Location
- Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
I was waiting for your comment... , banal platitudes though... of course the police should apply the law, that is their job, who has said or inferred otherwise? We can only go by the figures available and they, of course, consist of crimes that have been at the least reported and, ideally, dealt with.
Despite the Home Office, the CPS, the police and the 'authorities' in general doing everything they can to try and mislead the people of this country, the fact remains that immigrants do commit significantly more crime per head than the native population. Sit in the Courts, become a prison 'visitor' (actually don't, they are all rather odd, you know the sort, turtle neck sweaters, sandals and carrier bags with bits of hairy string poking out...), or spend time sifting the ever-so-cleverly obscured data and you'll come to the same conclusion, but you won't like it.
A very large proportion of immigrants, and these are the ones by which the vast majority of immigrant crime is perpetrated, come from pretty horrible places where the rule of law and civilised behaviour is notional at best, why should it be a surprise to anyone that they bring this, their 'culture', with them when the come to this country? After all, many bring their horrible and revolting superstitious / religious practices, such as genital mutilation, animal cruelty and enshrined misogyny with them... Multicultural Britain, you must be really proud of it... .
Your's is certainly an enlightening post but maybe not for all the right reasons. When I lived close to Slough for a while, I was always struck by the number of Indian parents who took their children's education very very seriously. They wanted their children to be supported and to go far in future careers and business. Many parents themselves were economically not as wealthy as their "native" counterparts.
I can say the same about Chinese Mauritian friends too.
I wonder how a professional standards body would regard the views espoused? This is not a threat, merely an observation. When in practice and if you were called to represent (say) my Son In Law (or his Father who is not a "native" based on any of your likely narrow criteria), would he receive 100% optimal representation based solely on your views expressed here? Come to think of it, if he was in front of a jury would he receive a totally fair and objective jural decision?
I think I will stick with my own moral compass as stated in my original post