Chemical Price Tracker

An Gof

Member
Location
Cornwall
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure epoxiconaole and chlorothalonil haven't been voted on yet by SCoPAFF. My gut feel is that epoxiconazole will go, I'm keeping everything crossed that we keep CTL.




I'm more confident that prothioconazole will be re-approved. I think this will be the only triazole which remains, but fortunately Revysol from BASF will arrive just in time to make the number of triazoles a whopping two.

CTL case doesn’t look good, I’m not as positive as you to it’s success in being reapproved. EU policy with ppp is frightening.
 

Brisel

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Midlands
The vote on CTL’s reregistration is due for March. To base approvals on hazard instead of risk is just daft but that’s the world we live in now.
 

robbie

Member
BASIS
Maybe rather sceptical of me but just as epoxi, teb and ctl go revysol comes along and and according to some agronomy meetings I've been to, will do rusts and septoria so don't worry but of course it'll be much more expensive. It does make you wonder if the chem company's are actually trying to get the old cheap stuff banned.
 

solo

Member
Location
worcestershire
Maybe rather sceptical of me but just as epoxi, teb and ctl go revysol comes along and and according to some agronomy meetings I've been to, will do rusts and septoria so don't worry but of course it'll be much more expensive. It does make you wonder if the chem company's are actually trying to get the old cheap stuff banned.
It’s no different to new tractor models really. New model requires new style filters at £25 compared to old model at £6. It’s quite a popular business model for lots of companies as it gives them a competitive advantage until spurious copies can be marketed.
 

Gordon Greenlaw

New Member
The timings of the review of the old chemistry and the development of new stuff is entirely coincidental. Instead of questioning the motives just be grateful that Revsol is on the horizon because the discovery of new actives that can meet all the new commercial and legislative demands has virtually dropped off a cliff. The number of new products coming along is now countable on fingers.
The generics don’t ride completely on the back of the majors when an active is renewed.They still have to submit some data and this aspect stops many Chinese companies from investing in the EU market.
 

david

Member
Location
County Down
At the rate actives are being revoked and very little new actives coming along, food production in the EU will become difficult.

The likelihood of pests, weeds and diseases developing resistance to the few actives that may remain will increase more rapidly.

Ultimately the EU will be forced to import food from other countries where GM, RNAi and CRISPR technology is allowed.
 

Flat 10

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Fen Edge
It's quite possible to grow crops equally as good as we're growing now with far less Chems it's just you has to get back to basics, be creative, think outside the box and look at history and how previous generations done it, to know how to do it in the future.
Big statement. Not sure how many of our grandfathers hit the current UK average yield......
 

robbie

Member
BASIS
Big statement. Not sure how many of our grandfathers hit the current UK average yield......
They didn't but with there knowledge and our current state of the art technology coupled with modern farming techniques and a few chems it's possible I'm sure.

If we can improve the soil we can grow healthy resilient crops that need less spend to keep them clean from disease. It's all basic stuff, doing my BASIS training has been a real eye opener as to the state of a lot of the soil and why such big spends are needed to keep crops going.
 
It's quite possible to grow crops equally as good as we're growing now with far less Chems it's just you has to get back to basics, be creative, think outside the box and look at history and how previous generations done it, to know how to do it in the future.
Previous generations used every technique they had available
Post 2nd world war investment in varieties and agronomy took decades for yields to increase now at a level 4 times higher than in 1919

The 7 million Irish people would have benefited from a modern control of potatoe blight 1 million died and 6 million emigrated due to crop failure

If Europe has reduced food production because we cannot use 21 century technology other continents will need to supply the food much will be produced with the aid of the technology not allowed in Europe
Gm gene editing crop protection products
 

robbie

Member
BASIS
I'm not talking about reducing output, I'm looking at changing how we produce the same or more from less Chems.

If you like it or not agriculture is changing and will change drasticly over the next 20 years. Chems are loosing approval left right and centre and with the likes of Gove at the top it's not going to change.

We, as an industry need to get back to basics and start looking closely at what we do and how we do it, things like good rotations, livestock on farms for fertility, cover crops, grazing etc, all things that previous generations did and knew how to do far better than us.
 

david

Member
Location
County Down
Good posts by Robbie and Yellow Belly, your both correct.

We have to learn to farm with reduced chemical input, as they are disappearing at an increasing rate .

BASF did produce blight resistant potatoes via GM technology, think of the chemical input that would save, but I believe they have put the project 'into storage'.
 
I'm not talking about reducing output, I'm looking at changing how we produce the same or more from less Chems.

If you like it or not agriculture is changing and will change drasticly over the next 20 years. Chems are loosing approval left right and centre and with the likes of Gove at the top it's not going to change.

We, as an industry need to get back to basics and start looking closely at what we do and how we do it, things like good rotations, livestock on farms for fertility, cover crops, grazing etc, all things that previous generations did and knew how to do far better than us.

More livestock won't give us higher grain yields collectively. Probably not cover crops either - they may help us to use our soil fertility more efficiently and trim some costs. Your talking as if mixed farms don't exist now - there's nothing but mixed farms over this side
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 102 41.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 90 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 36 14.6%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 10 4.1%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 864
  • 13
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top