Feldspar
Member
- Location
- Essex, Cambs and Suffolk
It seems reasonably widely accepted that true no-till doesn't work if you have a short rotation with only a few different types of crops. Cover crops help increase the diversity and can bring in different classes of crop (warm season broadleaves etc.) that were formerly lacking in the rotation. A multi-species cover crop is better than a single species cover crop according to a number of people as this mimics Nature more closely. These claim is intuitively compelling although I haven't seen any concrete in field evidence. Let's assume though that the above is roughly true.
Given the above what I wonder whehter it would be possible to stick to a pretty tight rotation if multi-species cover crops were included. For example:
WW - WOSR - (summer cover) - WW - (overwinter cover) - Spring Beans
Put another way, can a tight rotation with multi-species cover crops be just as good as a wider / longer rotation involving many different main cash crops?
Given the above what I wonder whehter it would be possible to stick to a pretty tight rotation if multi-species cover crops were included. For example:
WW - WOSR - (summer cover) - WW - (overwinter cover) - Spring Beans
Put another way, can a tight rotation with multi-species cover crops be just as good as a wider / longer rotation involving many different main cash crops?