Exfarmer
Member
- Location
- Bury St Edmunds
Some of this thread is way out of order!
I’m surprised Blinky was asked to speak or has he been silenced from above? Come on Andrew come and join us!
No he wouldn’t, billy big bolloxs in the yellow comic though where he doesn’t have to answer questions.He wouldn’t dare comment on here.
@Clive, I admire how TFF has shaken RT and NFU and hope that it’s a continuation of the mini revolution that’s happening, but I really take issue with the “no skin in the game” or “just a manager” comments regarding Farm Managers that crop up on here
Our “skin in the game” is our professional reputation, if we didn’t achieve results set by our employers targets we wouldn’t be able to continue in our positions, we couldn’t achieve our earning aspirations, or the bonus’s driven by the results we achieve
We run exactly the same businesses with the same skill sets as a “farmer” with the same pressures
I’ve known owner occupiers who employ advice of distributor agronomists, advisors and accountants and have less input on their own farms than I do as a Manager, is a managers opinion worth less than a “farmers??
Are people like Jake Freestone, David Millar, Craig Livingstone and our very own @Brisel opinions worth less because they don’t own or rent the land they farm ??
I agree and back your anti RT stance.i don’t own most of the land we farm
but i get your well made point
the difference is you, me and the other mangers you mentioned are not paid to represent AFS
I put this thread forward to Red Tractor to see if any action will be taken against Andrew in the light of farmer comments - got a solid no comment.
Draw into that what you will.
I put this thread forward to Red Tractor to see if any action will be taken against Andrew in the light of farmer comments - got a solid no comment.
Draw into that what you will.
I’ve thought a lot about the RT assurance argument. I do believe we need RT as our independent assessors to check that what we are legally required to do is being complied with. I do firmly believe that this is where the inspections should stop, there should be absolutely no gold plating. The alternative would be a multitude of consumer inspections which nobody would desire?
I’m sure there are people cleverly trying to engineer their own assurance system to their own advantage when the system already in place basically does what is required. However the bullpoo has to stop, no gold plating, no desires. Legal requirements only.
End of.
BB
What, stab him in the back you mean ?If I were RT, I wouldn't engage with this either. I'm sure there has been a word or two said to him internally. Are you expecting RT to hang him out to dry?
No, writing that you accept and perpetuate the RT premise that we can't be trusted to apply the law ourselves.I’ve thought a lot about the RT assurance argument. I do believe we need RT as our independent assessors to check that what we are legally required to do is being complied with. I do firmly believe that this is where the inspections should stop, there should be absolutely no gold plating. The alternative would be a multitude of consumer inspections which nobody would desire?
I’m sure there are people cleverly trying to engineer their own assurance system to their own advantage when the system already in place basically does what is required. However the bullpoo has to stop, no gold plating, no desires. Legal requirements only.
End of.
BB
If I were RT, I wouldn't engage with this either. I'm sure there has been a word or two said to him internally. Are you expecting RT to hang him out to dry?
The days are gone when people resign over these sort of gaffs. Look at all the recent examples: Dominic Cummings and Margaret Ferrier. Current strategy is to wait for things to blow over and fix in the background. So while I hoped RT would make a comment to denounce or "wind back" his statement with a clarification, they have chosen instead to stand by his statements. All this does is further distance farmers from Red Tractor IMO and at some point they need a drastic change of direction to get farmers back on board. From all the threads on here it is interesting to note that: assurance = good, Red Tractor = bad, which is an oxymoron in itself.
I had hoped Christine Tacon would be this change, but it seems she is struggling too.
Agreed - there is less honour these days but it seems to be the norm. RT really need to try and rebuild trust in their farmer members & this does not help their cause. Put yourself in their shoes for a minute - TFF has been a lion's den of anger. I hope they take on board the sentiment but I wouldn't expect them to do any less than retreat behind a wall of silence.
Christine Tacon is a thoroughly good sort and has her feet firmly on the ground - hopefully she will make them see the reality. She's not the type to post everything she does on social media and play to the crowd.
Agreed - there is less honour these days but it seems to be the norm. RT really need to try and rebuild trust in their farmer members & this does not help their cause. Put yourself in their shoes for a minute - TFF has been a lion's den of anger. I hope they take on board the sentiment but I wouldn't expect them to do any less than retreat behind a wall of silence.
Christine Tacon is a thoroughly good sort and has her feet firmly on the ground - hopefully she will make them see the reality. She's not the type to post everything she does on social media and play to the crowd.
RT is broken. Look at the mistrust. Look how many would jump tomorrow. They really need to respond by saying that they at least have heard what has been said. Perhaps the decimation of levy funded groups will show them what happens when costs go into junkets and buildings.