- Location
- Bedfordshire
Should the AHDB continue to partially fund Red Tractor unless we see a change of direction and an equal to imports level of assurance? Yes or No
AHDB POLL
- Thread starter principal skinner
- Start date
- Location
- Herefordshire
No,no no,no...............NO
Steevo
Member
- Location
- Gloucestershire
Anyone else need to put their brain into overdrive when reading the question? 
Feldspar
Member
- Location
- Essex, Cambs and Suffolk
No
Steevo
Member
- Location
- Gloucestershire
I don’t believe AHDB should fund Red Tractor at all. I don’t see why they should. I don’t see what we as farmers gain from using our levy money that way.
It’s not the clearestAnyone else need to put their brain into overdrive when reading the question?
Tarw Coch
Member
- Location
- Bottom of Wats Dyke
Yes, me.Anyone else need to put their brain into overdrive when reading the question?
I submitted my vote and the results came up.
I could see some numpty had voted yes so I clicked on it to see who it was.............. it was me
Luckily there’s the option to change vote
Anyone else need to put their brain into overdrive when reading the question?
it could be worded better
- Location
- Romney Marsh
No.
It is definately wrong that a compulsary levy that I have no choice in paying, is given to an organisation that stifles British farming.
Wake up AHDB and stop wasting our money !!
It is definately wrong that a compulsary levy that I have no choice in paying, is given to an organisation that stifles British farming.
Wake up AHDB and stop wasting our money !!
SilliamWhale
Member
No. RT are a private company.
They can raise their own money in the marketplace for the pleasure of having their board members call their funders backstabbers.
I'm minded to keep voting for the ahdb levy for cereals but then again circa .50p ton adds up to an awful lot of money for them. Can they spend it more widely?
They can raise their own money in the marketplace for the pleasure of having their board members call their funders backstabbers.
I'm minded to keep voting for the ahdb levy for cereals but then again circa .50p ton adds up to an awful lot of money for them. Can they spend it more widely?
Tarw Coch
Member
- Location
- Bottom of Wats Dyke
It does make you wonder if ahdb have any other inappropriate uses of levy payers money
- Location
- Bedfordshire
Its
Not worded the best I know but you get the idea!
Not worded the best I know but you get the idea!
- Location
- Cirencester
Certainly not, we already pay RT once so why the hell should they get another payment via AHDB, so in effect we pay RT twice.
I would have thought the Horticultural vote result should be a wake up call, gather there is a spud one ingoing and what if there was a cereals one, be the end of AHDB, so it maybe in their best interests to withdraw the funding from RT and actually support the levy payers, ie us.
I would have thought the Horticultural vote result should be a wake up call, gather there is a spud one ingoing and what if there was a cereals one, be the end of AHDB, so it maybe in their best interests to withdraw the funding from RT and actually support the levy payers, ie us.
- Location
- Shropshire
Livestock information limited!!!
Tarw Coch
Member
- Location
- Bottom of Wats Dyke
Who?
Never heard of them
- Location
- South Molton
Its the replacement for BCMS
Edit
Is this a back door way of making the industry pay for cattle tracing system?
Last edited:
Tarw Coch
Member
- Location
- Bottom of Wats Dyke
Well no sh1t sherlock it is something that will cost money for no gain after all so you would expect thatYou soon willNFU right behind it as well
- Tags
- ahdb cereals red tractor