Guy Smith's response to FW article on AIC rules.

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
I've put my views to a local farmer owned co-operative mill. The sentiment seems to be - we know its a unfair, the AIC kind of implore us to do it and we don't get a lot for our money from the AIC.

But at the end of the day like all other merchants, they're all right Jack. They will keep importing any old stuff as long as its cheap and what they want/ need.
Question is, if tgey weren't bound by AIC rules, woukd they purchase non-assured uk grain?

If tick-box pesticide declaration was touted as new standard, I would imagine they'd be happy with it.
 

tullah

Member
Location
Linconshire
Guy isn't daft, far from it.

It's just when we ask anyone why we can't use the exact same rules as imports do to assure grain, everyone hides under the nearest duvet, and hopes the question goes away. (I didn't specifically mean Guy)

We've got research going on into costs vs cost of RT, we've got research going on into what tests are done, blah blah, blah.

What we haven't got, is anyone at all answering our question. Why can't we assure UK grain in same/similar manner to imports? No answer. Question avoided..

I repeatedly asked Guy if there was anything wrong with the imported combinable crops fed to RT livestock? Is it poisonous, unsafe in any way, dangerous to our livestock or the consumer?

Simple question. Yes or no? No answer forthcoming. He just wouldn't answer, because he would have had to say "Yes it's safe", then there would have been no reason but to agree that UK grain could be assured in same manner as those safe imports.

Still no answer.

You can't not answer questions like that without losing credibility in your argument.
Perfect question for him. There's only one place where he will have to answer that.
 
Mills are currently getting assure grain for free. Talk to most farm traders though, and they all think assurance is bunkum. Still, they'd have to do whatever the boss says.


Indeed. Why should they care if they get away with it? And especially if so called farmer representatives are paid by Red Tractor then why should they care if seemingly farmers let useful idiots allow them to do that?
 

teslacoils

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
Openfield…? How many Openfield members could there be on here? They could have power in theory.

@ajd132 was planning to do some digging with Camgrain too on the central store angle I think.
Sigh. UK coops do not have the same strategic view as those on the continent.

I was eating some Anchor butter (green green grass, big union jack, lots of spiel "Anchor is produced by Arla Foods, the UK's leading farmer-owned dairy company, using 100% British Milk".

Well bugger me if after all that Arla is actually owned by the Danes! On nowhere is that mentioned in the text!

Had some UK bacon - owned by Danish coop.

It's not even funny how UK farmers are happy to sell up for two copper pennies, then watch as European coops take *all* the margin from the job.

The thing is, we don't seem to be able to get our thick heads around the notion that if you want success then you need to pay for it - better managers, better lawyers, better media, better PR.

How do you negotiate for better farm gate prices when your milk etc goes to a Danish coop then to a oligopoly supermarket? Grrr.
 

Clive

Staff Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lichfield
Sigh. UK coops do not have the same strategic view as those on the continent.

I was eating some Anchor butter (green green grass, big union jack, lots of spiel "Anchor is produced by Arla Foods, the UK's leading farmer-owned dairy company, using 100% British Milk".

Well bugger me if after all that Arla is actually owned by the Danes! On nowhere is that mentioned in the text!

Had some UK bacon - owned by Danish coop.

It's not even funny how UK farmers are happy to sell up for two copper pennies, then watch as European coops take *all* the margin from the job.

The thing is, we don't seem to be able to get our thick heads around the notion that if you want success then you need to pay for it - better managers, better lawyers, better media, better PR.

How do you negotiate for better farm gate prices when your milk etc goes to a Danish coop then to a oligopoly supermarket? Grrr.

100% 👍
 

ajd132

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Suffolk
This is abit of a confusing comment Clive as your support of U.K. co-ops has been very vocal and negative over the years which is a complete juxtaposition with your agreement to what Teslacoils is saying.
Ultimately the success of co ops is down to enough farmers getting behind and working togethor, which they seem to be very good at doing in europe, this means they have massive strength and resource, way beyond what any U.K. co op has.
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks

This is abit of a confusing comment Clive as your support of U.K. co-ops has been very vocal and negative over the years which is a complete juxtaposition with your agreement to what Teslacoils is saying.
Ultimately the success of co ops is down to enough farmers getting behind and working togethor, which they seem to be very good at doing in europe, this means they have massive strength and resource, way beyond what any U.K. co op has.
Seen as though we're on a farm assurance thread, maybe your comments amalgamate in general agreement, and the problem here is the farmers are not in control of RT. The farmer board members are in a minority, and appointed by RT, so they're probably RT 'Yes' men.

If we're obstructed by RT,AIC, NFU,AHDB, and oppressed to stay bound into RT, without being afforded our freedom, then maybe that will be the time to have farmer owned co-operative omov assurance. Why wouldn't everyone join? That said, I remember Clive has pointed out several times that getting farmers to do anything collectively is like herding cats.

I know we don't actually need that farmer owned assurance, as a pesticide declaration equals imports, so no need for farm level assurance.

If the 4 organisations continue to obstruct equivalence to imports, then at that point I think the only conclusion would have to be that the reasons for not allowing us equivalence to imports must be assurance company income and conflicts of interest from those purporting to work for farmers.
 

ajd132

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Suffolk
Seen as though we're on a farm assurance thread, maybe your comments amalgamate in general agreement, and the problem here is the farmers are not in control of RT. The farmer board members are in a minority, and appointed by RT, so they're probably RT 'Yes' men.

If we're obstructed by RT,AIC, NFU,AHDB, and oppressed to stay bound into RT, without being afforded our freedom, then maybe that will be the time to have farmer owned co-operative omov assurance. Why wouldn't everyone join? That said, I remember Clive has pointed out several times that getting farmers to do anything collectively is like herding cats.

I know we don't actually need that farmer owned assurance, as a pesticide declaration equals imports, so no need for farm level assurance.

If the 4 organisations continue to obstruct equivalence to imports, then at that point I think the only conclusion would have to be that the reasons for not allowing us equivalence to imports must be assurance company income and conflicts of interest from those purporting to work for farmers.
Sorry I’m just giving Clive some jip as his comments on it being hard to make farmers work togethor and comments on true co ops don’t align!
 

Humble Village Farmer

Member
BASE UK Member
Location
Essex
Is anyone on the RT board from Italian or Columbian heritage...? ;)

It’s impossible if you are out of your depth.

You wait for his reply this coming Friday. It’ll take things to another level. He will call us all out as idiots that do t understand the system or the way things work.

Unfortunately we all do understand the fraud that’s going on.

I wonder how merchants and feed mills feel? Purchasing imports without any req for farm level assurance, but being forced to stipulate it from their UK garmer suppliers. And those uk farmers could be the mill owners or co-op members.
They carry on as they are. They buy what they like, from where they like and they can sell it all as ufas, which suits them just fine so long as they are making money. No boring tests or checks to worry about. Someone else does all that for free.
 

teslacoils

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
Sorry I’m just giving Clive some jip as his comments on it being hard to make farmers work togethor and comments on true co ops don’t align!
I think the error in UK coops is not the farmers being unable to work together, but the inability of them to manage a dissimilar business.

In a way there's a link - were slagging off Guy for doing a job he's not really got the skillset for, at what in the private sector would be a knockdown rate. We think it's a huge wodge as were used to "farming rates" IE everything for tuppence.

Ditto with the NFU and advertising - this sort of media stuff needs doing by professionals, not farmers who have the luxury of a bit of free time. We bemoan advertising for our products or hark back to Beefy and Lamby, but the route to a good advert is knowing who the client is and paying a proper agency.

There is no doubt that coops should work, as proved overseas. The errors which seem to be repeated in many UK coops are:

1) short termism. The ability to sell out the dream is part of our UK financial nature.

2) lack of professionalism. Say you want to cooperate to process a product. Do you, having no knowledge of the process, a) get a skilled person with the right skillset to do it; pay them properly; and provide resources to achieve, or b) find a farmers son with some free time to do it?

3) bloat, or Billy Big Ballbag syndrome. You get a big grant for something and loose sight of the end goal by going down false avenues simply to get larger. This is due to lack of effective oversight.

There is no reason farmers coops shouldn't be able to both reduce costs and add value. We're lucky here to have a buying group and central store that are very effectively and professionally run, without getting excessive "back fat".
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 102 41.1%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 91 36.7%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 36 14.5%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 11 4.4%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 887
  • 13
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top