- Location
- Co antrim
Does she lift it with ease?
Does she lift it with ease?
Yes she lift it with no problem ,real strong hydraulics, only thing on the road because of the length of the plough if you hit a pothole she can bounce i also pull/lift a 2.7meter Quivogne Pluton (same as Sumo) and that is heavyDoes she lift it with ease?
Is that plough the medium duty plough? Iv a 4 furrow medium duty nh plough with discs,skimmers and combi wheel and my 5465 struggles with itYes she lift it with no problem ,real strong hydraulics, only thing on the road because of the length of the plough if you hit a pothole she can bounce i also pull/lift a 2.7meter Quivogne Pluton (same as Sumo) and that is heavy
I will look in the plough manual tomorrow ,not sur about medium duty but there is a HP headstock rating , the plough weighs 2400kgIs that plough the medium duty plough? Iv a 4 furrow medium duty nh plough with discs,skimmers and combi wheel and my 5465 struggles with it
What you really mean is that they lost that position over the last fifteen years or so and are struggling to regain it. I've no doubt that they are a worthy product but there are far fewer dealers than there used to be and those left have, until recently at least, struggled to get adequate back-up from the importer, allegedly.Like the mainstream brands they also have a good product offering, there have been gaps but they're being filled. Unlike the big boys which can partially trade off of their name and appeal Mccormick aren't in that position (yet).
Both excellent. The FPT engines are especially good.Should of said FPT engines or ZF transmissions , what are the reputations of these individually?
It was a combination of International Harvester and Standard Oil among others that instigated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to limit the power of monopolies in the US during the early part of the 20thC. While it did not break IH up, I think it did put a damper on it buying up many more of its competitors, both upcoming and established.I think McCormick, like Farmall, was a brand name of International Harvester. It was not seen as a name on UK tractors since the 60s (IIRR). IH was bought/merged into the Case Corporation in the 1980s. Case IH was bought in 99 by the Fiat Corporation and merged into the New Holland group. At that point, due to monopoly issues the group had to unload some factories and production over the World. This included the Doncaster plant, which had originally been IH. The brand name Mccormick was sold with the factory and some existing Case models to the Italian Argo group that also owned Landini.
In the mid 00s the the Doncaster plant was closed and new Mccormick tractors became Italian in origin.
From what I gather, the only IH Mccormick heritage today is the brand name.
The problem for McCormick margins and prices on its larger models in particular is that it buys in engines and transaxles from companies that also supply and, in the case of engines, manufacture, rival products in the same class. Therefore their ability to undercut the price of rivals that also use, for instance, the ZF transaxle, is very limited indeed. Thinking that they could get near to undercutting their similar rivals with a similar specification by 40% is in the realms of being in Cloud-Cuckoo-land.If mccorrmick kept the same price list for the next couple of years they could become alot more attractive
I think that hits the nail. The only possible advantage to the end user and depreciation apart, would be the proximity to a very good reliable dealer/agent.The problem for McCormick margins and prices on its larger models in particular is that it buys in engines and transaxles from companies that also supply and, in the case of engines, manufacture, rival products in the same class. Therefore their ability to undercut the price of rivals that also use, for instance, the ZF transaxle, is very limited indeed. Thinking that they could get near to undercutting their similar rivals with a similar specification by 40% is in the realms of being in Cloud-Cuckoo-land.
I would say its the medium duty as in the book there is 3 headstocks ,a 120 a 150 and a 180 ,mine is the 150 and can be used on tractors up to 220hp ,my McCormick is 163hp . i was told the backend of my 155 is the same as the MTX200Is that plough the medium duty plough? Iv a 4 furrow medium duty nh plough with discs,skimmers and combi wheel and my 5465 struggles with it
Yes I think ground was lost as they transitioned from a manufacturer producing at the lower end of the market to one using top quality components and investing heavily in R & D. Also the use of some cheap components to try and gain an edge over Case in the early days has left the perception that it should be a cheap brand.What you really mean is that they lost that position over the last fifteen years or so and are struggling to regain it. I've no doubt that they are a worthy product but there are far fewer dealers than there used to be and those left have, until recently at least, struggled to get adequate back-up from the importer, allegedly.
Hopefully they will get their act together because, as you say, strong competition in the marketplace is a good thing and McCormick do have some good dealers that deserve a higher market share, especially as the product is better than its ever been.
Yes produced in the same factory in Italy.Anyway Mccormick is just the same as a Landini? Few more dealers about.
Yes and other manufacturers have much larger buying power. It's very chicken and egg. Need to sell more units to increase buying power but could do with lower prices to help improve market share. Its a slow game but we're making progress . At the end of the day Mccormick as we know it is only about 20 years old. The other players have been around for decades except perhaps Kubota & Claas (in the tractor market). Would be concerning for their sakes if we'd already overtaken them!The problem for McCormick margins and prices on its larger models in particular is that it buys in engines and transaxles from companies that also supply and, in the case of engines, manufacture, rival products in the same class. Therefore their ability to undercut the price of rivals that also use, for instance, the ZF transaxle, is very limited indeed. Thinking that they could get near to undercutting their similar rivals with a similar specification by 40% is in the realms of being in Cloud-Cuckoo-land.
Rather than me give you reasons or run down the competition why don't you get in touch with your local dealer and book yourself a demo?Ok, so for my next 130hp loader tractor, what makes a McCormick better than Claas, Kubota ,Deutz?
What would sway me from a Case?
I thought it was sad when the factory at Doncaster was closed.Ok, so for my next 130hp loader tractor, what makes a McCormick better than Claas, Kubota ,Deutz?
What would sway me from a Case?
I thought it was sad when the factory at Doncaster was closed.
What if Mc used a Cummins engine? That would be worth a look.
The Doncaster factory made the smaller four cylinder tractors which still used the 1970's chassis and back axles. Everything totally outdated years before it closed. Even the French built Maxxum tractors and transmissions, which were a late 1980's design, initially meant to replace the bigger David Browns in the Case lineup with transmissions manufactured at StDizier were becoming obsolete by the end. The StDizier plant was sold to a Korean company who continued to make the powershift transmissions for some years before closing it down.I thought it was sad when the factory at Doncaster was closed.
What if Mc used a Cummins engine? That would be worth a look.
I have to say that the new x7 tractors really look the business .Rather than me give you reasons or run down the competition why don't you get in touch with your local dealer and book yourself a demo?
Yes they have a great product, good warranty options and excellent finance packages, but nothing I say will convince you without you trying one and that's absolutely fine.
As Mccormick's marketing team like to say,
Try it, We Dare You!