Look what came in the post!

ajcc · Nov 22, 2017

The archeological aspect is the driving force being used in the original post/(my case)
NE insisting that I prove a negative ie that there is no adverse archeological impact from my farming on fictitious archeology.
Ostensively there is no habitat,botanical or natural history interest just archeology but English Heritage are not interested just NE and a DEvon county archaeologist who has visited the farm once for 30 mins.!

neilo · Nov 22, 2017

Fiacre said:
Yes, they have already received details of inputs, but insist that they also require the archeological survey. The opportunity for a reseed has now long passed for the time being.

Sorry, I hadn't picked up on the archaeological reference. Are there not maps of ancient monuments and such like available through CADW? I know my Glastir Advanced manager contacted them to see what was about (& potentially scoring points) on our farm.

ajcc · Mar 10, 2018

franklin · Mar 10, 2018

Do you get the feeling that they were only on the neighbouring land to have a look at what you were doing?

Davey · Mar 10, 2018

Assuming you've got a solicitor representing you with the appeal I'd just pass the letter onto them to deal with.

They do seem pretty determined though

Look what came in the post!

ajcc

Member

neilo

Member

ajcc

Member

franklin

New Member

Davey

Member

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

0 %

Up to 25%

25-50%

50-75%

75-100%

100% I’ve had enough of farming!

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

Share this page