- Location
- South wales
Why’s is it not possible to ignore content from tff mods ?
Ok but the direct result tread was running fine and how are we supposed to know that we take part in an interesting topic in one room and we get locked out because some of the contributors fell out in anotherI'm sorry. I have not the faintest idea what you are talking about. The thread I locked was as a direct result of a spat on another thread that had to be moderated
I think you've misunderstood. Thread A needed moderating. Thread B resulted only because someone was named in thread A and it was started by one of the aggrieved.. Before thread B (which was only started to carry on the argument from thread A) dived, it was lockedOk but the direct result tread was running fine and how are we supposed to know that we take part in an interesting topic in one room and we get locked out because some of the contributors fell out in another
Thats ok then, for a min I thought the power had gone to your head, like I said until today I had not noticed you as a mod which is good isnt it , over modaration is a killer to any farming forumI think you've misunderstood. Thread A needed moderating. Thread B resulted only because someone was named in thread A and it was started by one of the aggrieved.. Before thread B (which was only started to carry on the argument from thread A) dived, it was locked
Actually I think it's brilliant you hadn't noticed.Thats ok then, for a min I thought the power had gone to your head, like I said until today I had not noticed you as a mod which is good isnt it , over modaration is a killer to any farming forum
Best of luc k to you , nice to have a mod who explains things in a friendly manner without getting shirtyActually I think it's brilliant you hadn't noticed.
I post on here almost exclusively as a TFFer with my opinions and ideas
Hmmm.........did you miss the post where he told another member to go do one ?Best of luc k to you , nice to have a mod who explains things in a friendly manner without getting shirty
Just don’t venture into brexit thenHmmm.........did you miss the post where he told another member to go do one ?
I reported it, and surprise, surprise, nowt was done........
Was he trying to talk up the straw price ?Hmmm.........did you miss the post where he told another member to go do one ?
I reported it, and surprise, surprise, nowt was done........
Hmm. What did he post in the first place however? Hates the place here but still postsHmmm.........did you miss the post where he told another member to go do one ?
I reported it, and surprise, surprise, nowt was done........
Needed moderating, or you choosed to moderate it ?I think you've misunderstood. Thread A needed moderating. Thread B resulted only because someone was named in thread A and it was started by one of the aggrieved.. Before thread B (which was only started to carry on the argument from thread A) dived, it was locked
Needed moderating, or you choosed to moderate it ?
No your not unusual - very few members use the ignore function
Just a few that are that intolerant of others point of view it seems
As I often state, my natural inclination is always to let things run on. The number of times folks complain that reports are not auctioned should reflect that
On that occasion I would say needed , yes
I read the T&C's, I weigh the amount of comment, PMs to me and reports and I try to apply common sense and a gut feel. What would you do?Since no names need be mentioned, will you let us know how users many choose to ignore someone?
What criteria do you use and how much is personal discretion rather than cast iron rules?
Allow anything within the law and appropriate for a forum which children have access to.I read the T&C's, I weigh the amount of comment, PMs to me and reports and I try to apply common sense and a gut feel. What would you do?
Allow anything within the law and appropriate for a forum which children have access to.
My misunderstanding, I was referring to 'genuine' posters and their content. Of course trolling that cannot be automatically prevented should be stopped by staff where possible.Trolling is but one example that we cite in our T & C’s that our members would not like to see permeate throughout the Forum - legal though it may be.
My misunderstanding, I was referring to 'genuine' posters and their content. Of course trolling that cannot be automatically prevented should be stopped by staff where possible.
But, I suppose, that raises the problem of where to draw the line when defining trolling. Some is obvious, but someone who just disagrees and provokes, seemingly endlessly, for fun could be very close to being a troll but still get the benefit if the doubt.
Grass turning time!