Boris........

Mouser

Member
Location
near Belfast
Ha ha

The problem is people on here think a long term lockdown is the answer and will protect them/their loved ones from the virus but sadly that is not the case unless you keep the country locked down and people locked up in their homes for several years at least until a vaccine may be ready.

Harsh truth is that we are going to have to open up the country again and live with the virus for several years.

A prolonged lockdown is NOT the answer and will cause more problems/ deaths than it solves/ saves.
We know that, the purpose of the lockdown is to allow the nhs to cope. To give them a sporting chance to save as many as possible. To stop people having PTSD because the had to choose who to give the last ventilator to. To stop them having to turn off an elderly patient to try to save a 40yr old who then dies anyway. Can you imagine having to do that? f**k taxes this is real life
 

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
Why was Boris Johnson taken to intensive care?

Tuesday April 07 2020, 12.01am, The Times

Covid-19 is a respiratory disease: when things go badly downhill it is usually a result of problems breathing.

Boris Johnson is understood to have been transferred to intensive care in case he needs ventilation, a sign that the prime minister may be struggling to get enough oxygen into his blood.

Initially what is likely to change is more intensive monitoring and oxygen therapy, said Alison Pittard, dean of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine.

Boris Johnson is being treated at St Thomas’ which has a programme to revolutionise cardiovascular and respiratory services for patients

Boris Johnson is being treated at St Thomas’ which has a programme to revolutionise cardiovascular and respiratory services for patients

“At his stage moving on to intensive care units is about keeping them under continuous monitoring and any other help they need in terms of oxygen and a little bit of help to make breathing easier,” she told The Times.

On a standard ward oxygen therapy is given through a mask but if Mr Johnson was not responding to that treatment in ICU it can be given through a more intensive technique known as continuous positive airway pressure. “You wouldn’t administer it unless you were able to continuously monitor a patient,” Dr Pittard said.

“On the wards you just don’t have the staff to do that.”
She said the one-on-one monitoring possible in intensive care was another reason for such transfers. “With someone in his position I assume they would be even more cautious. They will be concerned enough that they want continuous monitoring so that if he deteriorates someone sees it immediately.”
Intravenous fluid and nutrition could also be given if breathing makes him dehydrated. However, inotropic drugs to force the heart to contract more powerfully and ensure blood gets to vital organs are usually only given to patients on ventilators.
While coronavirus is a mild disease for most patients, about 5 to 10 per cent of those infected need hospital treatment, with a recent study from Imperial College London putting the figure at 8.2 per cent of those, like the prime minister, in their 50s.
About a third of those in hospital need intensive care, where they are put under intensive monitoring from nurses and specialist equipment looking at markers heart rate and blood oxygen levels. The next stage would be use of a ventilator to push air into the lungs if he struggles to breathe on his own.
Mark Porter, The Times doctor, said: “The main reason people with Covid-19 are transferred to intensive care is because they need some form of respiratory support as they struggle to maintain oxygenation on their own.”
Dr Porter warned there was also a risk of bacterial pneumonia, and although easier to treat [for example through intravenous antibiotics], it can still be life threatening.

Prime minister is treated by the best respiratory team in Britain
At 10 Downing Street, Boris Johnson lives across the river from one of the best respiratory hospitals in Britain.
Since November 2017, St Thomas’ has been involved in a programme to revolutionise cardiovascular and respiratory services for patients.
A team of consultants is attached to the intensive care unit of the Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS trust. Among them is Luigi Camporota, whose areas of expertise includes respiratory failure and advanced mechanical ventilation. On Thursday last week he joined a seminar in which he spoke of how to best ventilate Covid-19 patients.
“I am going to share with you a model of ventilation that reflects phases of these disease,” he said, adding that the UK was “rapidly catching up with the rest of Europe in terms of cases”.
Dr Camporota, who has a PhD in airway and lung biology, presented a graph showing the 129 patients across the Guy’s and St Thomas’ trust which showed that the number of patients requiring ventilation was increasing. The average age of patients at the hospital was 57 he said. Mr Johnson is 55.
As the prime minister’s condition worsened it is likely he was moved from the Howard Ward, a private unit on the top floor, to an intensive care unit in the east wing of the hospital.
In response to the pandemic the hospital has assigned a Covid-19 team made up of 20 respiratory, palliative care and rheumatology consultants and six specialist respiratory nurses.
Duncan Wyncoll, consultant in critical care on the unit, is responsible for treating those patients with severe respiratory failure using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The treatment involves prolonged cardiac and respiratory support for people whose heart and lungs are unable to sustain life.
 

Scribus

Member
Location
Central Atlantic
Why was Boris Johnson taken to intensive care?

Tuesday April 07 2020, 12.01am, The Times

Covid-19 is a respiratory disease: when things go badly downhill it is usually a result of problems breathing.

Boris Johnson is understood to have been transferred to intensive care in case he needs ventilation, a sign that the prime minister may be struggling to get enough oxygen into his blood.

Initially what is likely to change is more intensive monitoring and oxygen therapy, said Alison Pittard, dean of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine.

Boris Johnson is being treated at St Thomas’ which has a programme to revolutionise cardiovascular and respiratory services for patients

Boris Johnson is being treated at St Thomas’ which has a programme to revolutionise cardiovascular and respiratory services for patients

“At his stage moving on to intensive care units is about keeping them under continuous monitoring and any other help they need in terms of oxygen and a little bit of help to make breathing easier,” she told The Times.

On a standard ward oxygen therapy is given through a mask but if Mr Johnson was not responding to that treatment in ICU it can be given through a more intensive technique known as continuous positive airway pressure. “You wouldn’t administer it unless you were able to continuously monitor a patient,” Dr Pittard said.

“On the wards you just don’t have the staff to do that.”
She said the one-on-one monitoring possible in intensive care was another reason for such transfers. “With someone in his position I assume they would be even more cautious. They will be concerned enough that they want continuous monitoring so that if he deteriorates someone sees it immediately.”
Intravenous fluid and nutrition could also be given if breathing makes him dehydrated. However, inotropic drugs to force the heart to contract more powerfully and ensure blood gets to vital organs are usually only given to patients on ventilators.
While coronavirus is a mild disease for most patients, about 5 to 10 per cent of those infected need hospital treatment, with a recent study from Imperial College London putting the figure at 8.2 per cent of those, like the prime minister, in their 50s.
About a third of those in hospital need intensive care, where they are put under intensive monitoring from nurses and specialist equipment looking at markers heart rate and blood oxygen levels. The next stage would be use of a ventilator to push air into the lungs if he struggles to breathe on his own.
Mark Porter, The Times doctor, said: “The main reason people with Covid-19 are transferred to intensive care is because they need some form of respiratory support as they struggle to maintain oxygenation on their own.”
Dr Porter warned there was also a risk of bacterial pneumonia, and although easier to treat [for example through intravenous antibiotics], it can still be life threatening.

Prime minister is treated by the best respiratory team in Britain
At 10 Downing Street, Boris Johnson lives across the river from one of the best respiratory hospitals in Britain.
Since November 2017, St Thomas’ has been involved in a programme to revolutionise cardiovascular and respiratory services for patients.
A team of consultants is attached to the intensive care unit of the Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS trust. Among them is Luigi Camporota, whose areas of expertise includes respiratory failure and advanced mechanical ventilation. On Thursday last week he joined a seminar in which he spoke of how to best ventilate Covid-19 patients.
“I am going to share with you a model of ventilation that reflects phases of these disease,” he said, adding that the UK was “rapidly catching up with the rest of Europe in terms of cases”.
Dr Camporota, who has a PhD in airway and lung biology, presented a graph showing the 129 patients across the Guy’s and St Thomas’ trust which showed that the number of patients requiring ventilation was increasing. The average age of patients at the hospital was 57 he said. Mr Johnson is 55.
As the prime minister’s condition worsened it is likely he was moved from the Howard Ward, a private unit on the top floor, to an intensive care unit in the east wing of the hospital.
In response to the pandemic the hospital has assigned a Covid-19 team made up of 20 respiratory, palliative care and rheumatology consultants and six specialist respiratory nurses.
Duncan Wyncoll, consultant in critical care on the unit, is responsible for treating those patients with severe respiratory failure using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The treatment involves prolonged cardiac and respiratory support for people whose heart and lungs are unable to sustain life.
1. Why is it that every photo of a hospital features the plod or soldier boys?

2. Politicians treat the electorate as mere statistics, so why isn't Boris being considered in the same light?
 

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
I didn't say you would be happy but you imply that you would be prepared to have no quality of life/ freedoms for the rest of your life if that saves a few people from the virus.
no I haven't and I notice that you haven't quoted where I have said this, because I haven't said it and you just made it up
The problem is people on here think a long term lockdown is the answer
can you quote someone, just one person on here that said long term lockdown is the answer?
 

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
.
1. Why is it that every photo of a hospital features the plod or soldier boys?

2. Politicians treat the electorate as mere statistics, so why isn't Boris being considered in the same light?

I will rise to the fly!

Question 1: Psychologists would I suspect observe such pictures send signals to the population, of security and fear in equal measure. That the state is kind benevolent but at same time can be harsh and potentially authoritarian.

Question 2: First among equals. The ruling elite would argue that the proletariat would subconsciously wish that the leading politicians and rulers receive preferential treatment to ensure safety in their own proletarian existence.

I await due opprobium!
 

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
Quite, according to Doctor Guth nobody has ever died of CV so what's the worry

Well looking at the data in The Times article 5-10% of those that contract CV19 require hospitalisation, with 8.2% of those in there 50's. And a third in hospital require Intensive Care. Well I am a tad older and do not like the look of those numbers. as a very risk averse gambler, I would not back a horse to win on those odds. Am going to accelerate my washing hands and keeping clear of other people - getting worried now about the internet - can this virus come down the phone line!! This is no Flu.
 
Ha ha

The problem is people on here think a long term lockdown is the answer and will protect them/their loved ones from the virus but sadly that is not the case unless you keep the country locked down and people locked up in their homes for several years at least until a vaccine may be ready.

Harsh truth is that we are going to have to open up the country again and live with the virus for several years.

A prolonged lockdown is NOT the answer and will cause more problems/ deaths than it solves/ saves.
puts yourself in the governments position and you will see why they cannot lift the lock down now until a vaccine is ready, as soon as they do and a spike in cases happens the NHS will be quickly overwhelmed and many citizens and their loved ones will die, not a nice call to make they will be seen as murderers so the lockdown WILL continue
 

Smith31

Member
puts yourself in the governments position and you will see why they cannot lift the lock down now until a vaccine is ready, as soon as they do and a spike in cases happens the NHS will be quickly overwhelmed and many citizens and their loved ones will die, not a nice call to make they will be seen as murderers so the lockdown WILL continue

Tin hat on but the government have been totally useless.The local building and groundworks firms are operating here. They had the intelligence to bulk buy diesel, parts, ppe and extra welfare vans back in January, knowing full well that we would be facing a disaster.

In comparison, the government sent our NHS workers, supermarket staff, bus drivers and many other public services staff to their death, by not providing ppe or any risk assessment strategy. The advice changes on a daily basis, they make it up as they go.

Even their own staff don't believe them, just look at the chief medical officer in Scotland who stuck two fingers up at the guidelines.

Why supermarket checkouts did not have perspex screens fitted months ago is beyond me, a single infected checkout operative had the potential to infect a thousand shoppers a day.

As harsh as it sounds , the government only started to take the virus seriously when politicians started showing symptoms themselves, before that point it was a case of lets adopt herd immunity, it will only kill off plebs.
 
Last edited:

Jackov Altraids

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
Tin hat on but the government have been totally useless.The local building and groundworks firms are operating here. They had the intelligence to bulk buy diesel, parts, ppe and extra welfare vans back in January, knowing full well that we would be facing a disaster.

In comparison, the government sent our NHS workers, supermarket staff, bus drivers and many other public services staff to their death, by not providing ppe or any risk assessment strategy. The advice changes on a daily basis, they make it up as they go.

Even their own staff don't believe them, just look at the chief medical officer in Scotland who stuck two fingers up at the guidelines.

Why supermarket checkouts did not have perspex screens fitted months ago is beyond me, a single infected checkout operative had the potential to infect a thousand shoppers a day.

As harsh as it sounds and I apologise to the loyal Conservatives, the government only started to take the virus seriously when politicians started showing symptoms themselves, before that point it was a case of lets adopt herd immunity, it will only kill off plebs.

I think that is a cynical and unfair assessment.
It's very easy for firms to stockpile extra supplies, somewhat more complicated for a nation. Not only in terms of logistics but it would of been criticised for taking the limited supplies away from the likes of Italy who were desperate for supplies.
Advice changing on a daily basis is a positive and essential thing which will be evermore so as the government has no real other option than to 'experiment' with relaxation of lockdown measures.
You are quite right about supermarket checkouts but the companies themselves should have sorted that much more quickly under government advice and the need to satisfy their duty of care to staff.
It was clear from early days that this virus did not discriminate between 'plebs' and anyone else. The herd immunity suggestion was more of an admission that widespread circulation of this virus was inevitable.
It is very easy to be an expert in hindsight but I think it will be shown that everything has been in the most reasonable way given the information available at the time.
 

caveman

Member
Location
East Sussex.
Tin hat on but the government have been totally useless.The local building and groundworks firms are operating here. They had the intelligence to bulk buy diesel, parts, ppe and extra welfare vans back in January, knowing full well that we would be facing a disaster.

In comparison, the government sent our NHS workers, supermarket staff, bus drivers and many other public services staff to their death, by not providing ppe or any risk assessment strategy. The advice changes on a daily basis, they make it up as they go.

Even their own staff don't believe them, just look at the chief medical officer in Scotland who stuck two fingers up at the guidelines.

Why supermarket checkouts did not have perspex screens fitted months ago is beyond me, a single infected checkout operative had the potential to infect a thousand shoppers a day.

As harsh as it sounds and I apologise to the loyal Conservatives, the government only started to take the virus seriously when politicians started showing symptoms themselves, before that point it was a case of lets adopt herd immunity, it will only kill off plebs.
Where as yourself, was all over the media and standing up in parliament day after day, back in january, urging the government to get with your programme.
Heck. I reckon you were even pushing Tony Blair, way back when, to get a warehouse stuffed full with thousands of ventilators, just in case?
 
Last edited:

Smith31

Member
I think that is a cynical and unfair assessment.
It's very easy for firms to stockpile extra supplies, somewhat more complicated for a nation. Not only in terms of logistics but it would of been criticised for taking the limited supplies away from the likes of Italy who were desperate for supplies.
Advice changing on a daily basis is a positive and essential thing which will be evermore so as the government has no real other option than to 'experiment' with relaxation of lockdown measures.
You are quite right about supermarket checkouts but the companies themselves should have sorted that much more quickly under government advice and the need to satisfy their duty of care to staff.
It was clear from early days that this virus did not discriminate between 'plebs' and anyone else. The herd immunity suggestion was more of an admission that widespread circulation of this virus was inevitable.

My wife works for the NHS (gp) I personally asked a local dairy farm to donate gloves for the cleaners at the hospital, as supplies were so short a few weeks ago. For me that is poor planning.

We make ppe in this country all the government had to do was pump money into these companies back in December, it really isn't difficult.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 102 41.0%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 91 36.5%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 37 14.9%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 11 4.4%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 907
  • 13
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top