Anton Coaker Blog
Member
11th June 2020 I side stepped past it this week
So, what’s it to be…..what statues to leave standing, or not burning any more coal?
Well, I sidestepped the BLM stuff last week, so perhaps I should reluctantly venture into it now. I say reluctantly, because it’s very difficult to make any kind of comment that isn’t strictly in-tune with social correctness without being shouted down as a wicked person. And to start, I’ll be clear. I consider the policeman in the US who knelt on that mans neck until he died did a terrible thing, and should rightly face trial for it. It is indefensible, although I rather suspect I can guess what his defence will claim when he does come to trial. A jury will have to make of that what they will.
As for events then somehow morphing into a series of protests for racial equality here, and claiming some kind of parity with the way the UK police act…well, I become less clear there. I’m pretty sure that our serving Home Secretary, who I presume has the far end of the rein controlling the nation’s police service, is a lady of Asian descent herself. That alone begs some fundamental questions about the proposition. This is not the US. The police here are not, as a rule, packing guns. Nor, when they apprehend someone, are they ordinarily expecting them to be carrying firearms. The situation is very different. And those citing incidents which could be described as parallel should be ready with comparable statistics if they wish to win me over. So far I’m not hearing such.
Moving on to historical matters, and that wretched statue that’s currently languishing in Bristol harbour. It’s regrettable that the civic authorities didn’t act on the matter some time ago. I understand there was an attempt to give it a new plaque, explaining how Mr Colston made his fortune, but no-one could agree on how to proceed.
Personally, I couldn’t care less one way or another. There are lots of things which offend me – really, heaps. I find whole tranches of urban Britain, and indeed much of urban humanity as a whole, offensive to my very core. But I have to accept that we live in a democracy, and if I’m unable to vote in someone who’ll enact my particular desires, I have to put up with it. That is how society needs to work. Allowing a minority to have their way by illegal direct action is not how a society works. It sets an extremely dangerous precedent.
As for moving the argument onto Cecil Rhodes, Clive of India, and then going looking for some forgotten pigeon guano infested bronzes to be offended by. That’s a pretty strange way to go through life isn’t it? And as for trying to drag Sir Francis Drake into it….you can get lost with that nonsense buster. Drake is remembered for his military success and some officially sanctioned thievery, knocking over some Spanish ships loaded with gold they had in turn stolen from the Aztecs. Any connection with slave trading is completely incidental…it’s not what Drake was famous for then, and not what we remember him for now.
And anyone wanting to keep bringing up the salve trade around me will be reminded that the capture and enslavement of others is as old as human civilisation. Demonising old Colston for his part in the awful wholesale trans-Atlantic slave trade is one thing. But trying to separate out who you think were the good guys throughout history is, at best, futile baloney.
As distasteful as we find it now, enslavement was found practically everywhere. Ancient Roman and Egyptian cultures were built on it, their galleys fuelled by it. Native Americans practiced it widely. The Norwegians who settled Iceland took numbers of Irish slaves with them –indeed, Cork was a slave trading centre, and North Africans extensively plundered British and mainland European coasts for slaves at the same time as we were shipping West Africans across the Atlantic. Forced detention and labour was ubiquitous….it still goes on today.
We now accept it is wrong, and can’t happen in an enlightened society. And one thing is for sure. No single group or race can claim ‘ownership’ of being the victims of it, however much they might want to.
On balance, if you want to move the case for what you consider to be a better society…throwing insults, bottles and punches at policemen here, and tearing down statues you don’t approve of, is probably not going to help. I’m generally pretty neutral about race, not much caring what your ethnicity is as long as you don’t bother me. But I’m afraid that has to go both ways.
So, what’s it to be…..what statues to leave standing, or not burning any more coal?
Well, I sidestepped the BLM stuff last week, so perhaps I should reluctantly venture into it now. I say reluctantly, because it’s very difficult to make any kind of comment that isn’t strictly in-tune with social correctness without being shouted down as a wicked person. And to start, I’ll be clear. I consider the policeman in the US who knelt on that mans neck until he died did a terrible thing, and should rightly face trial for it. It is indefensible, although I rather suspect I can guess what his defence will claim when he does come to trial. A jury will have to make of that what they will.
As for events then somehow morphing into a series of protests for racial equality here, and claiming some kind of parity with the way the UK police act…well, I become less clear there. I’m pretty sure that our serving Home Secretary, who I presume has the far end of the rein controlling the nation’s police service, is a lady of Asian descent herself. That alone begs some fundamental questions about the proposition. This is not the US. The police here are not, as a rule, packing guns. Nor, when they apprehend someone, are they ordinarily expecting them to be carrying firearms. The situation is very different. And those citing incidents which could be described as parallel should be ready with comparable statistics if they wish to win me over. So far I’m not hearing such.
Moving on to historical matters, and that wretched statue that’s currently languishing in Bristol harbour. It’s regrettable that the civic authorities didn’t act on the matter some time ago. I understand there was an attempt to give it a new plaque, explaining how Mr Colston made his fortune, but no-one could agree on how to proceed.
Personally, I couldn’t care less one way or another. There are lots of things which offend me – really, heaps. I find whole tranches of urban Britain, and indeed much of urban humanity as a whole, offensive to my very core. But I have to accept that we live in a democracy, and if I’m unable to vote in someone who’ll enact my particular desires, I have to put up with it. That is how society needs to work. Allowing a minority to have their way by illegal direct action is not how a society works. It sets an extremely dangerous precedent.
As for moving the argument onto Cecil Rhodes, Clive of India, and then going looking for some forgotten pigeon guano infested bronzes to be offended by. That’s a pretty strange way to go through life isn’t it? And as for trying to drag Sir Francis Drake into it….you can get lost with that nonsense buster. Drake is remembered for his military success and some officially sanctioned thievery, knocking over some Spanish ships loaded with gold they had in turn stolen from the Aztecs. Any connection with slave trading is completely incidental…it’s not what Drake was famous for then, and not what we remember him for now.
And anyone wanting to keep bringing up the salve trade around me will be reminded that the capture and enslavement of others is as old as human civilisation. Demonising old Colston for his part in the awful wholesale trans-Atlantic slave trade is one thing. But trying to separate out who you think were the good guys throughout history is, at best, futile baloney.
As distasteful as we find it now, enslavement was found practically everywhere. Ancient Roman and Egyptian cultures were built on it, their galleys fuelled by it. Native Americans practiced it widely. The Norwegians who settled Iceland took numbers of Irish slaves with them –indeed, Cork was a slave trading centre, and North Africans extensively plundered British and mainland European coasts for slaves at the same time as we were shipping West Africans across the Atlantic. Forced detention and labour was ubiquitous….it still goes on today.
We now accept it is wrong, and can’t happen in an enlightened society. And one thing is for sure. No single group or race can claim ‘ownership’ of being the victims of it, however much they might want to.
On balance, if you want to move the case for what you consider to be a better society…throwing insults, bottles and punches at policemen here, and tearing down statues you don’t approve of, is probably not going to help. I’m generally pretty neutral about race, not much caring what your ethnicity is as long as you don’t bother me. But I’m afraid that has to go both ways.