- Location
- Owaka, New Zealand
We can out-cheap corn and we can undercut oil, can't we White-girl?
Is that grass fed genetics forum on Facebook, Pete?View attachment 915692
We can out-cheap corn and we can undercut oil, can't we White-girl?View attachment 915693
Yes!Is that grass fed genetics forum on Facebook, Pete?
Is that grass fed genetics forum on Facebook, Pete?
been lucky enough to have been given, a load of farming mags, from 1951/2, the most striking difference, is the size of the cattle, much smaller, and the photo's are mainly of the winners, at various shows, also, from all around the british empire, as well. Farmers, in some ways, are greedy, we want the biggest and best ! This has led to the breeders, breeding larger, to win prizes, as until fairly recent times, show winners, were the top, no figures, like EBL, or PLI, were available. So, we were breeding from the biggest, not necessarily the best, even now, size is important, in farmers eyes. Many still buy, by looks, not figures.View attachment 915692
We can out-cheap corn and we can undercut oil, can't we White-girl?View attachment 915693
Nothing to apologise for there!been lucky enough to have been given, a load of farming mags, from 1951/2, the most striking difference, is the size of the cattle, much smaller, and the photo's are mainly of the winners, at various shows, also, from all around the british empire, as well. Farmers, in some ways, are greedy, we want the biggest and best ! This has led to the breeders, breeding larger, to win prizes, as until fairly recent times, show winners, were the top, no figures, like EBL, or PLI, were available. So, we were breeding from the biggest, not necessarily the best, even now, size is important, in farmers eyes. Many still buy, by looks, not figures.
Fast forward to now, big holstien cows, big continental suckler cows, are very popular. NZ and our grazing system cows, have realised, you can get more kg/beef/milk/acre, with smaller cows. With the bull breeders, this is a problem, if they start producing smaller beef bulls, they would get hammered on price, farmers, looking for biggest, which may well be, less profitable. The difference between, big/small, is very noticeable, in stocking rate, you can keep more cows/acre, therefore more calves/beef, but perhaps, the biggest difference, is that you can leave smaller cattle, out, for a longer grazing season, they do not damage the soil, like big heavy cows. The spring grazing herds, have shown it works, and works well. NBA, have caused controversy, over the suggested changes to carcass age/weight, smaller cows, producing more kg/ac of beef, are far more efficient, than big cows, producing less, and that's before the 'carbon' is added in. Realise, i will have upset some, reading this, i therefore apologise now.
The odd thing there is that countries with the harshest, longest winters (ie, not here ) tend to run the biggest cows (increases feeding / wintering cost, even on 5p/kgDM) and then end up wondering why the cow/calf job never seems to have a lot of money in itbeen lucky enough to have been given, a load of farming mags, from 1951/2, the most striking difference, is the size of the cattle, much smaller, and the photo's are mainly of the winners, at various shows, also, from all around the british empire, as well. Farmers, in some ways, are greedy, we want the biggest and best ! This has led to the breeders, breeding larger, to win prizes, as until fairly recent times, show winners, were the top, no figures, like EBL, or PLI, were available. So, we were breeding from the biggest, not necessarily the best, even now, size is important, in farmers eyes. Many still buy, by looks, not figures.
Fast forward to now, big holstien cows, big continental suckler cows, are very popular. NZ and our grazing system cows, have realised, you can get more kg/beef/milk/acre, with smaller cows. With the bull breeders, this is a problem, if they start producing smaller beef bulls, they would get hammered on price, farmers, looking for biggest, which may well be, less profitable. The difference between, big/small, is very noticeable, in stocking rate, you can keep more cows/acre, therefore more calves/beef, but perhaps, the biggest difference, is that you can leave smaller cattle, out, for a longer grazing season, they do not damage the soil, like big heavy cows. The spring grazing herds, have shown it works, and works well. NBA, have caused controversy, over the suggested changes to carcass age/weight, smaller cows, producing more kg/ac of beef, are far more efficient, than big cows, producing less, and that's before the 'carbon' is added in. Realise, i will have upset some, reading this, i therefore apologise now.
You see it all the time on the mainstream areas of the forum: 'My Limmy cows take some feeding, eight month winter here, it's a hard place to farm etc.'The odd thing there is that countries with the harshest, longest winters (ie, not here ) tend to run the biggest cows (increases feeding / wintering cost, even on 5p/kgDM) and then end up wondering why the cow/calf job never seems to have a lot of money in it
If you have to feed a cow '100kg too big' for 50 days, then there's an extra 100kgDM down the hatch.
But if you feed for 200 days then that's 400kgDM which becomes an expensive thing to breed for, an odd thing in some ways... why make a tough job tougher?
Chances are 14 500kg cows will give you more calves than 10 700kg cows
It is when you are trying to farm woolly mammoths in a shaking swamp!!You see it all the time on the mainstream areas of the forum: 'My Limmy cows take some feeding, eight month winter here, it's a hard place to farm etc.'
Nothing wrong it what your saying and as farmers we have to be careful following trends but the problem with the small cow argument is the UK spec grid, anything under 270kg dead weight is penalised.been lucky enough to have been given, a load of farming mags, from 1951/2, the most striking difference, is the size of the cattle, much smaller, and the photo's are mainly of the winners, at various shows, also, from all around the british empire, as well. Farmers, in some ways, are greedy, we want the biggest and best ! This has led to the breeders, breeding larger, to win prizes, as until fairly recent times, show winners, were the top, no figures, like EBL, or PLI, were available. So, we were breeding from the biggest, not necessarily the best, even now, size is important, in farmers eyes. Many still buy, by looks, not figures.
Fast forward to now, big holstien cows, big continental suckler cows, are very popular. NZ and our grazing system cows, have realised, you can get more kg/beef/milk/acre, with smaller cows. With the bull breeders, this is a problem, if they start producing smaller beef bulls, they would get hammered on price, farmers, looking for biggest, which may well be, less profitable. The difference between, big/small, is very noticeable, in stocking rate, you can keep more cows/acre, therefore more calves/beef, but perhaps, the biggest difference, is that you can leave smaller cattle, out, for a longer grazing season, they do not damage the soil, like big heavy cows. The spring grazing herds, have shown it works, and works well. NBA, have caused controversy, over the suggested changes to carcass age/weight, smaller cows, producing more kg/ac of beef, are far more efficient, than big cows, producing less, and that's before the 'carbon' is added in. Realise, i will have upset some, reading this, i therefore apologise now.
I like doing stuff the easy way if possible
Do lambing and calving when there's a bit of feed and decent weather do do it in
I run some big cows here but not exactly by design, trying to breed them smaller, but they are pedigree Herefords and I like some of them a lotYou see it all the time on the mainstream areas of the forum: 'My Limmy cows take some feeding, eight month winter here, it's a hard place to farm etc.'
with the xbred cows, culls under 220kg carcass weight, take a fair knock, and the NBA, pushing for the younger/lighter carcasses, will have to work hard to change that. It's easy to get side tracked, on carcass value, the best measure, is kg/beef/acre sold, similar to milk, it may well be, the extra kg's of beef, counter the heavier carcass, and that's before taking into account, cow maintenance costs, smaller cows, can stay out longer, and eat less, both big +'s. And, then, you have the dreaded carbon production, do small cows, fart less than big ones ? I don't know, never stood behind 1 long enough ! They do claim smaller cows, are more carbon neutral, lighter carcasses certainly are, unfortunately, carbon, is a buzz word, and no doubt, will continue to be so, any planning, should always bear that, in mind, restraints, will be set, by people that are NOT farmers.Nothing wrong it what your saying and as farmers we have to be careful following trends but the problem with the small cow argument is the UK spec grid, anything under 270kg dead weight is penalised.
So 500kg - 550kg live weight will get hammered on price , if you leave some small native bred animals to gain over that weight they go fat & get penalised that way.
Like all things it's finding the right balance.
why is producing more kg of beef more efficient ? apart from more kg/acre of beef what are you achieving ?been lucky enough to have been given, a load of farming mags, from 1951/2, the most striking difference, is the size of the cattle, much smaller, and the photo's are mainly of the winners, at various shows, also, from all around the british empire, as well. Farmers, in some ways, are greedy, we want the biggest and best ! This has led to the breeders, breeding larger, to win prizes, as until fairly recent times, show winners, were the top, no figures, like EBL, or PLI, were available. So, we were breeding from the biggest, not necessarily the best, even now, size is important, in farmers eyes. Many still buy, by looks, not figures.
Fast forward to now, big holstien cows, big continental suckler cows, are very popular. NZ and our grazing system cows, have realised, you can get more kg/beef/milk/acre, with smaller cows. With the bull breeders, this is a problem, if they start producing smaller beef bulls, they would get hammered on price, farmers, looking for biggest, which may well be, less profitable. The difference between, big/small, is very noticeable, in stocking rate, you can keep more cows/acre, therefore more calves/beef, but perhaps, the biggest difference, is that you can leave smaller cattle, out, for a longer grazing season, they do not damage the soil, like big heavy cows. The spring grazing herds, have shown it works, and works well. NBA, have caused controversy, over the suggested changes to carcass age/weight, smaller cows, producing more kg/ac of beef, are far more efficient, than big cows, producing less, and that's before the 'carbon' is added in. Realise, i will have upset some, reading this, i therefore apologise now.
Farmers with big tractors say their efficient because they do more work per driver , other farmers say small tractors are more efficient because they burn less fuel , who's right ? Probably somewhere in between or different tractors suit different farms....same with cow sizes.Efficient
As soon as I see it with no reference to what they are trying to be efficient at I want to know just that before we move on.
If its just producing more then without more information its irrelevant
The one with no tractor?Farmers with big tractors say their efficient because they do more work per driver , other farmers say small tractors are more efficient because they burn less fuel , who's right ? Probably somewhere in between or different tractors suit different farms....same with cow sizes.
That's trueThe one with no tractor?