Ivorbiggun
Member
- Location
- Norfolk
Talking to a bloke today who works on a farm a couple of mile from us, their going to try farming 5000 acres with 3 full time staff with students brought in for harvest. The worlds gone mad.
Talking to a bloke today who works on a farm a couple of mile from us, their going to try farming 5000 acres with 3 full time staff with students brought in for harvest. The worlds gone mad.
With respect, if you think that then you don’t understand the law. Do a risk assessment (which doesn’t even usually need to be written, for typical farm situation) and then follow the outcome. The most appropriate tool will depend on the situation but might be a ladder, a scaffold or a helicopter.
As far as I'm concerned the safest thing to work at height on the farm would be a man cage on the telehandler. But my machine isn't LOLER'd so I can't do that, despite it being the safest option. Thats the thing, we don't have an 'Assess risk yourself and then do the safest thing based on your own assessment' regime we have a hybrid of that plus lots of 'laws' the HSE have made up entirely themselves. Ie HSE can both claim your risk assessment was wrong if an accident occurs, and prosecute, and if your paperwork is wrong still prosecute you even if an accident hasn't happened. Ergo its not risk assessment based at all. If it was it would be entirely outcome based - I assessed the risk, did the job and an accident didn't happen. Ergo it was safe.
After all my assessment of risk might not be yours, so whats the point of a H&S system that pretends to allow the individual to make their own assessment of risk but then measures those assessments against their own yardstick? Its basically saying 'You must assess risk yourself, but you must always come up with the answer that I've already thought of, but won't tell you what it is until after the event'.
How many staff do you employ?
None.
None. And I never will due to all this nonsense.
This is the biggest problem. Private enterprise understandably becomes hesitant to employ anyone because of the bureaucracy that is involved. And when the public sector employs someone they go overboard with rules and regulations and everyone wonders why the cost of it rockets and nothing gets done.
Farmer got couple of the lads to come in at weekends and do some jobs for cash , one fell through a roof and broke his back , not covered under the original contract as they were not working under their instruction or knowledge.
Not covered by his insurance as he was responsible for their health and safety whilst on farm and well simply didn’t bother .
Long and short of it between health and safety breaches and fines and the unfortunate lads lawyers he basically had to sell up and retire in order to pay out all the legal costs , and all to save a few quid rather than getting it done through the contractor officially.
Over and above that Corporate Manslaughter is now a very real thing in today’s business world is it really worth sharing a cell for a year or two to save an hour or two of time or a few quid to pay “ Cash to save a few quid.
Employment does bring responsibilities, and rightly so, but not necessarily bureaucracy. There are too many myths and misunderstandings out there, and in this thread, but please don’t suggest that HSE costs and expectations are any higher for one or two staff than they are for none. Until you get to (from memory) five employees, there is no need for extra HSE paperwork at all.
But my machine isn't LOLER'd so I can't do that, despite it being the safest option.
Employment does bring responsibilities, and rightly so, but not necessarily bureaucracy. There are too many myths and misunderstandings out there, and in this thread, but please don’t suggest that HSE costs and expectations are any higher for one or two staff than they are for none. Until you get to (from memory) five employees, there is no need for extra HSE paperwork at all.
Why is your machine not LOLER'd? I was under the impression that it is a legal requirement.
StagedGenuine or staged? My first thought would be to help, not to film it!
Is also be very careful getting in (a number of farm fatalities come from trying to re-enter a runaway machine).
No salary is guaranteed..... mine isn’tMuch easier to say from the comfort of a guarunteed salary Rob, in fairness.
Maybe a bad choice of words on my part. Is your income weather dependent? Amount you receive largely out of your control?No salary is guaranteed..... mine isn’t
So do you drive all your tractors at 32kph... genuinely?Look at overturned tractors on roads, its not the over 60's usually, its the under 30's. Ban 50k tractors and enforce the weight limits, that would improve safety no end.
Why would I do that, when the limit is 40kph?So do you drive all your tractors at 32kph... genuinely?
Mine ain’t but it’s dependant on other deadlines. My wife works in interiors. She has her own company. She employs 6. She has deadlines , she pays massive tax. She doesn’t service her own car. She also doesn’t dictate her profit. She sets her prices then fights for them. Nothing in life is guaranteed. A man platform cost what, a tank of spray. A roofer can be used while you farm. We can all find excuses why safety can’t be met.Maybe a bad choice of words on my part. Is your income weather dependent? Amount you receive largely out of your control?
Since when has limit been 40k?Why would I do that, when the limit is 40kph?