Fella near me used to scrape out with a te20, abour 10 years ago it was worn out completely. A cheap new Indian tractor was bought with a functional hr meter. The tractor blew up about a year later with 800 hrs on it. He remarked that the fergie had been scraping out for about 50 years, no wonder it was knackered!2003 ,18000 hrs
1000 hrs a year
20 hrs a week
3 hrs a day ,
Doesn't sound a lot does it?
No, It was the 1.6 Diesel engine in those days, the Mondeo had the rubbish 2.3 engine at that point followed by a 1.8 turbo.It would have likely the same engine as a mondeo though. My point maybe better made via engine size.
Volvo TD60 !MAN or MWM - proper engines. Cummins 6bt in with them, Perkins 6534 not far behind in reliability status.
It isnt that hard to buy new again (if you save the cash!) swapping twice at 5 years costs more than 1 swap at 10 years.. its dealer margin at every swap, but I find you get a feel of impending doom if you are the driver and then think about swapping .The problem with running machines for long hours over many years is the cost to change for a new one. Once you step off of the 1/3/5year replacement policy its very very difficult to get back on. You need to ask yourself, if you are sure, that you don't want to go back to new machine ownership in the future. We do both over a couple of businesses and as long as you have the workshop/labour to deal with replacing a gearbox/engine on a machine its do-able but if you are relying on a dealer the costs will be large and you will of wished you had put that money into a new machine.
New machines have problems too mostly little niggles but the warranty should cover these on the whole. Overall I would say the older machines cost less to run but its not that straight forward.
Is it okay to do what you want if its never in the budget!!?It isnt that hard to buy new again (if you save the cash!) swapping twice at 5 years costs more than 1 swap at 10 years.. its dealer margin at every swap, but I find you get a feel of impending doom if you are the driver and then think about swapping .
Surely the best thing is buy at 5 yrs and sell at 10It isnt that hard to buy new again (if you save the cash!) swapping twice at 5 years costs more than 1 swap at 10 years.. its dealer margin at every swap, but I find you get a feel of impending doom if you are the driver and then think about swapping .
Man engine and turboshift best tractor ever built possibly
They also had piston liners crack occasionally and engine couplers fail but still do 20k hours at minimal cost per hourBut they were not flawless. The handbrake used to stick on our 818 and it had a few other niggles. Having the hydraulic cross controller down by the side of the seat was awkward compared to the 920 we had. But they were very good on fuel.
Surely the best thing is buy at 5 yrs and sell at 10
The Mo0ndy never had the 2.3 (as you say, terrible), that was the Sierra. |
Funny how they run cat dozers and Volvo dump trucks and slews.I’m sure several watch gold rush on discovery.Parker has recently purchased a D11 caterpillar for ripping.think it’s around 20 years old and 126,000hours on it.apparently equivelant to working 14 years non stop and all heavy work.I’d imagine that’s had a few engine,transmission and final drive rebuilds over the years but obviously still worth doing.as mentioned plant is in a differant league to farm equipment.
nick...
Tony has a cat excavator they blur the name out onFunny how they run cat dozers and Volvo dump trucks and slews.
Wonder what the depreciation on that Leyland would be, would they have been more than £6200 new?That's nothing, 'Tis but a scratch etc compared to the 62,000 Hour Leyland in Classic Tractor this month, like triggers broom!
Mind you I'd rather spend those hours sitting in a Fendt rather than an old Leyland, god knows what the 83 year old owners back is like after using that Leyland hedgecutting for so long!