Y Fan Wen
Member
- Location
- N W Snowdonia
NTBs are more important than tariffs.Does he know if we will have tariffs ? Untill that is known its pure guesswork
NTBs are more important than tariffs.Does he know if we will have tariffs ? Untill that is known its pure guesswork
Yes and we will be trying to deal with the French outwith the single market!NTBs are more important than tariffs.
what barriers did he think would be used ?NTBs are more important than tariffs.
pointVAT on food will hurt the consumer, putting their costs up 20% instantly. It means little to a VAT registered business like your average farm though I can see a sudden collapse in the demand for high end shopping for premium brands & organic, just like post Credit Crunch. I doubt the government would just do it overnight - start at 5% and gradually ratchet it up over a longer period of time. It's too big a price shock to do at once.
Here is a logical fallacy - just because you do not know anything, doesn't mean that others (who may have taken the trouble and effort to become better-informed) do not know more than you.Like I say negative rubbish,no one knows and anyone who says they do are lying trying to push their own agenda
Better informed from what,listening to people that have a twisted idea of what is good for us and I haven't been knocked down by the rush of remain experts after all they got project fear completely right didn't theyHere is a logical fallacy - just because you do not know anything, doesn't mean that others (who may have taken the trouble and effort to become better-informed) do not know more than you.
It's why, after all, there are no 'leave' experts.
But we do know that what we had was a fallacy for alot people but not all of course , there was an opportunity to choose - people have rightly or wrongly , do you stay on the sinking ship and whinge and wait to be rescued or chance the life boat ? but now we are in the lifeboat the whingers want to go back for their luggage because they are getting their feet wet and arguing over the route ! (but hopefully we left the rats on the ship )Here is a logical fallacy - just because you do not know anything, doesn't mean that others (who may have taken the trouble and effort to become better-informed) do not know more than you.
It's why, after all, there are no 'leave' experts.
The point I believe the article was making is that good prices would fall by 20% plus so tax could be applied with out a cost to the public. Meanwhile, the public purse would bulge with cash!
I really hope you're right but I think we'll be lucky to avoid a major correction in sheep numbers.Interesting, thats my flock getting expanded ! if the experts predict disaster im in ! they get it wrong every time and would to be fair would be better shutting up as they just worry folk who are easily worried for no good reason.
This has happen`d before while in the EU.I really hope you're right but I think we'll be lucky to avoid a major correction in sheep numbers.
Seems to me it was always going this way, regardless of brexit how many farms rely on subs to make the sheep job pay, when the CAP is going to be reformed and less money going to the farmer anyway?I really hope you're right but I think we'll be lucky to avoid a major correction in sheep numbers.
I like that word"correction".I really hope you're right but I think we'll be lucky to avoid a major correction in sheep numbers.
You can read all about the dreary future here. Remember, Dr North is an enthusiastic leaver but because of his previous jobs has an expert knowledge of the barriers to trade that being a third country entails.what barriers did he think would be used ?
@gone up the hill Actually they have agreed to move the medicines agency to Amsterdam and the banking agency to Paris. About 1,000 direct jobs and probably some more that depend on their existence.
It is very sad that, despite extensive media explanation, some still do not understand what is happening.
1. The EU27 has asked the UK to agree to settle outstanding accounts and what is open to debate is (a) the principle and (b) the methodology and (c) the resultant figure.
2. The UK has accepted the principle but has not yet confirmed that it agrees the methodology.
3. Instead, the UK prefers to skip that stage and agree a final figure as a 'broad brush' approach.
4. The difficulty is obvious - without an agreed methodology, there can be no obvious compromise: it's either pay the total, or justify a lesser sum via a proper methodology.
5. Instead, the UK is negotiating with itself due to political weakness.
But there is a time limit, which is closer than many think - the December Council meeting is the last opportunity to agree, before industry and the City begin an adverse commentary.
I think that Abi Kay's call is correct, but we shall know quite shortly.