Alarming aspirations from latest climate report...

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
This new report by a group of UK academics on the impact of livestock on climate warming makes interesting reading in relation to Joseph Poore's work:


It is not the full story and, notably, has no contribution from any leading climate warming academic like professor Myles Allen (Oxford Martin Climate School) but it does include this table which highlights how Joseph Poore's impact figures differ greatly from those of DEFRA:

1613473029282.png
 
Last edited:

delilah

Member

This just popped up on a Facebook group I follow, don't know how genuine it is but thought I'd share it anyway....

Can you put a reply up pointing him and others to this thread ?
 

delilah

Member
This new rport by a group of UK academics on the impact of livestock on climate warming makes interesting reading in relation to Joseph Poore's work:


It is not the full story and, notably, has no contribution from any leading climate warming academic like professor Myles Allen (Oxford Martin Climate School) but it does include this table which highlights how Joseph Poore's impact figures differ greatly from those of DEFRA:

View attachment 941485

Any chance of someone doing that table again to show the 'global warming potential' of our livestock as a big fat zero ?
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
Any chance of someone doing that table again to show the 'global warming potential' of our livestock as a big fat zero ?
It's DEFRA figures so based on GWP100, as per current IPCC guidance. That actually makes it more interesting as it is at such variance with the EAT-Lancet figures but, on the face of it, uses the same underlying method.
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
Any chance of someone doing that table again to show the 'global warming potential' of our livestock as a big fat zero ?
On what basis? It would need to have the data calculations behind it to be worth doing. Some uk ruminant production is sequestering net carbon, some will not be due to the energy used in growing, transporting and processing the feedstuffs. We need to be robust in anything we put up against these academics or we risk just making ourselves look silly and irrelevant.
 

delilah

Member
On what basis? It would need to have the data calculations behind it to be worth doing.

Are we saying that none of our lot have done that ? We have had this sh!tstorm coming our way for years, have we still not got a scientist on board who can show that there is nothing wrong our side of the farm gate ?
Rhetorical questions I know, just wanted to make the point at what a bunch of muppets we are.
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
Are we saying that none of our lot have done that ? We have had this sh!tstorm coming our way for years, have we still not got a scientist on board who can show that there is nothing wrong our side of the farm gate ?
Rhetorical questions I know, just wanted to make the point at what a bunch of muppets we are.
Few of the ruminant farmers I have spoken to who have claimed their system has no effect on climate warming appeared to have any real grasp of the scientific basis needed to substantiate that claim. I'm not really competent to myself despite having done huge amounts of reading round the subject. I defer to the likes of Dr Richard teague (Texas A&M University), Prof. Myles Allen (Oxford Martin Climate School) and Prof. Dave Frame (Victoria University Climate School) for the detail. Without a full LCA I will make no bold claims for our farm though I will still debate the issues.

The same fault can be said of many of those who castigate us but it's their choice to spout unsubstantiated "facts" against us.

I am really waiting for the 6th IPCC report as the big decider. If it does adopt GWP* for methane then we have a strong argument to fight back with. If it doesn't it'll need some good reasons why not.
 

delilah

Member
We could get it done ourselves foc. What a fantastic Phd it would be for a student wanting to make a splash: "A study of all available scientific literature to show that shooting all of the cows in the UK would make no contribution to reducing UK GHG emissions".
 
Few of the ruminant farmers I have spoken to who have claimed their system has no effect on climate warming appeared to have any real grasp of the scientific basis needed to substantiate that claim. I'm not really competent to myself despite having done huge amounts of reading round the subject. I defer to the likes of Dr Richard teague (Texas A&M University), Prof. Myles Allen (Oxford Martin Climate School) and Prof. Dave Frame (Victoria University Climate School) for the detail. Without a full LCA I will make no bold claims for our farm though I will still debate the issues.

The same fault can be said of many of those who castigate us but it's their choice to spout unsubstantiated "facts" against us.

I am really waiting for the 6th IPCC report as the big decider. If it does adopt GWP* for methane then we have a strong argument to fight back with. If it doesn't it'll need some good reasons why not.


So is there ANY evidence yet that CO2 does anything at all in the atmosphere or is it all still hypothesis ?

For example exposing a known volume of gas with varying CO2 levels to a known radiation source. Should be pretty easy to setup.
 

DaveGrohl

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Cumbria
Few of the ruminant farmers I have spoken to who have claimed their system has no effect on climate warming appeared to have any real grasp of the scientific basis needed to substantiate that claim. I'm not really competent to myself despite having done huge amounts of reading round the subject. I defer to the likes of Dr Richard teague (Texas A&M University), Prof. Myles Allen (Oxford Martin Climate School) and Prof. Dave Frame (Victoria University Climate School) for the detail. Without a full LCA I will make no bold claims for our farm though I will still debate the issues.

The same fault can be said of many of those who castigate us but it's their choice to spout unsubstantiated "facts" against us.

I am really waiting for the 6th IPCC report as the big decider. If it does adopt GWP* for methane then we have a strong argument to fight back with. If it doesn't it'll need some good reasons why not.
There was a post on Faceache earlier from a bloke claiming to be an expert reviewer for the IPCC report due out in July. He says it pushes hard for a plant based diet. I'm not 100% sure whether he means he's actually read the report now from what he's posted but I don't like the sound of it. He's critical of the report. I'd rather they got it right frankly but I'm a loooong way from hopeful.

And is it just me, or is just about every single person blaming livestock for climate change using "info" that starts and ends with Poore & Nemecek as its source?
 

DaveGrohl

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Cumbria

This just popped up on a Facebook group I follow, don't know how genuine it is but thought I'd share it anyway....
Sorry Ted, I didn't realise you'd posted the actual link.
 

Ted M

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Shropshire
Sorry Ted, I didn't realise you'd posted the actual link.
No worries 👍, I only saw it this morning and posted it out of interest more than anything.
Wether it was genuine or not maybe another matter, I'm sure people who are privy to such information probably have a confidentiality clause in their contract
 

delilah

Member
No worries 👍, I only saw it this morning and posted it out of interest more than anything.
Wether it was genuine or not maybe another matter, I'm sure people who are privy to such information probably have a confidentiality clause in their contract

I had a look at his fb page, he has the XR logo in his photo box thingy, so I am taking it that when he says he is an 'expert reviewer' then he is a reviewer on behalf of XR.
Before everyone rolls their eyes at that....if, as he says, he has seen through the CCC report as being the work of global corporations who wish to control the food chain, and is going to get XR to oppose it on those grounds, then great.
UK ag and the Envi movement are each others greatest allies.
 
This new report by a group of UK academics on the impact of livestock on climate warming makes interesting reading in relation to Joseph Poore's work:


It is not the full story and, notably, has no contribution from any leading climate warming academic like professor Myles Allen (Oxford Martin Climate School) but it does include this table which highlights how Joseph Poore's impact figures differ greatly from those of DEFRA:

View attachment 941485
A big part of the difference is the note about the system boundaries in the small print at the bottom. The Poore and Nemecek draws incredibly wide system boundaries, see image below. Starting at deforestation and ending at retail shelf, Defra stopped at farm gate according to the notes
1613553731311.png
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
A big part of the difference is the note about the system boundaries in the small print at the bottom. The Poore and Nemecek draws incredibly wide system boundaries, see image below. Starting at deforestation and ending at retail shelf, Defra stopped at farm gate according to the notes
View attachment 941656
Agreed. Both methods are missing Key nuance though.

In DEFRA's case it's the impacts beyond our shores (which is compliant with IPCC adopted process :banghead:). In Poore & Nemceck's case it's using globalised data to denigrate uk production methods.

I've also not seen any evidence of Poore & Nemceck attempting to share the impact of South American deforestation between the grazing that initially follows and the soya and palm oil production that is often the eventual use of the land or to adequately allocate the impacts of soya production between the primary human use and the secondary livestock by-product use. (Brazilian law prevents deforested land being used to grow rowcrops, much more valuable than grazing, for 2 years so it's common to graze for 2 years then convert to row crops).

I believe Poore & Nemceck also adopted a much wider LCA boundary for meats than for plant products like cereals, maize, meat alternatives and nuts.

Have I missed something?
 
Last edited:

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 103 40.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.5%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.3%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 12 4.7%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,454
  • 27
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top