Danllan
Member
- Location
- Sir Gar / Carms
Word is that there are new questions in our defence circles regarding why so many men of such rank have been killed. There is still a general - no pun intended - belief that these fellows have probably been killed as the media have suggested, through having to be at the front and pushing their troops to do the necessary.
But... a second theory is starting to gain a bit of ground, it's very difficult to substantiate without knowing more about these men and the situation on the ground. But... some people are starting to wonder if these men have not been killed in action, but by their own side, for one of two reasons.
1) That they were 'accidentally' killed by their own men's fire - meaning that the troops didn't like their insistence on going forward to inevitable death, so killed them at the first opportunity; or,
2) That they were deliberately killed by Putin-loyalists, because they voiced opposition to, or questioned what was being done, or refused to carry out things in the desired way.
Clearly either are significant, but the latter - if true - would be quite remarkable and by far the more significant.
But... a second theory is starting to gain a bit of ground, it's very difficult to substantiate without knowing more about these men and the situation on the ground. But... some people are starting to wonder if these men have not been killed in action, but by their own side, for one of two reasons.
1) That they were 'accidentally' killed by their own men's fire - meaning that the troops didn't like their insistence on going forward to inevitable death, so killed them at the first opportunity; or,
2) That they were deliberately killed by Putin-loyalists, because they voiced opposition to, or questioned what was being done, or refused to carry out things in the desired way.
Clearly either are significant, but the latter - if true - would be quite remarkable and by far the more significant.