How can they justify that?!That is good money
How can they justify that?!That is good money
How can they justify that?!
I get that as a devoted straw chopper myself it’s just the payment seems way too high...Soil health? A ham fisted attempt at reducing soil erosion and nitrate leaching? Seems short sighted in a nation with so many livestock, but I haven’t looked at the story and the theory behind it yet.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Whats too high about it !! Id take 500 if i got it Its probably based on the average price and yield of straw and as the scheme has a budget of 10 million the payment will be lower if to many acres are entered . The aim is to get around 20 % of the straw returned to the land to help increase om levels and also to put floor in the market to put a few extra quid in growers pockets . The Gov has been getting serious grief over the plight of the cereal sector and has committed to helping the sector . After all the cash the splashed on the Dairy boyos its about time .I get that as a devoted straw chopper myself it’s just the payment seems way too high...
25euro rather 250 would be more understandable.
What plight of the cereal sector?!Whats too high about it !! Id take 500 if i got it Its probably based on the average price and yield of straw and as the scheme has a budget of 10 million the payment will be lower if to many acres are entered . The aim is to get around 20 % of the straw returned to the land to help increase om levels and also to put floor in the market to put a few extra quid in growers pockets . The Gov has been getting serious grief over the plight of the cereal sector and has committed to helping the sector . After all the cash the splashed on the Dairy boyos its about time .
Note i always take off my Dairy hat when im finished milking The country is a better place with a mix of livestock and arable farms and as most of the Arable farmers are operating across hundreds rather than thousands of acres the need a little support now and then . Anyway these Dairy boomers can well afford to pay a little more for their straw if the rents the bid for land are anything to go by .
One of my clients still owes me for 200 bales and this Saturday his door is going to be left flat on the ground when i start kicking it in looking for payment . Its the like of him that take the good out of the Straw job his share is definitely going into the scheme . Anyway we will see how this pan out . Its a horrid crack the whole thing
Poor prices, bad weather, high input costs . The cereal sector has been hit hardest in the rebalancing of the sfp . Teagasc farm income data shows the slippage in cereal grower incomes compared to the Dairy sector . Remember we are talking about small and medium sized farms here not large estates . Farming is still very important over here and the pr electoral system makes sure that politicans take notice . Farmers contribute to the well being and prosperity of the nation and are entitled to a fair shake .What plight of the cereal sector?!
How has your sfp been rebalanced? Always made me laugh that the 'common' ag policy was always anything but common...... Even within what is technically the same country........... (wales and scotland have been very different to england as i understand it)Poor prices, bad weather, high input costs . The cereal sector has been hit hardest in the rebalancing of the sfp . Teagasc farm income data shows the slippage in cereal grower incomes compared to the Dairy sector . Remember we are talking about small and medium sized farms here not large estates . Farming is still very important over here and the pr electoral system makes sure that politicans take notice . Farmers contribute to the well being and prosperity of the nation and are entitled to a fair shake .
When the sfp was first introduced payments were based on the average of a the previous three years . As arable farmers were paid arable aid on an area basis rather than on a per head basis like livestock farmers the were given the option to stack their intitlementsHow has your sfp been rebalanced? Always made me laugh that the 'common' ag policy was always anything but common...... Even within what is technically the same country...........
Double like for that.When the sfp was first introduced payments were based on the average of a the previous three years . As arable farmers were paid arable aid on an area basis rather than on a per head basis like livestock farmers the were given the option to stack their intitlements
This doubled the per acre value of them and halved the amount of land required to collect them . Many myself included took full advantage and kicked a lot of low margin rented ground back . The beauty of the scheme was the farmer not the landowner owned the entitlement and it was the gift that kept on giving . When the Cilos reforms started to flatten the entitlement value those of us with high value entitlements from stacking were severely hit
Over your side of the puddle whereas the Welsh and Scotch opted for the historic model like over here the English came up with a cunning plan called the dynamic hybrid to restore the entitlement value to landlords and make sure that tenants didnt get much advantage @glasshouse is the man who can explain how fischler reform should have worked until the CLA and the Gov got together to mininise the benefit to tenants . The British establishment has form when it comes to diluting european farmer support schemes so sadly no surprise .
Only thing I would say is the historic system made it harder for new entrants did it not?When the sfp was first introduced payments were based on the average of a the previous three years . As arable farmers were paid arable aid on an area basis rather than on a per head basis like livestock farmers the were given the option to stack their intitlements
This doubled the per acre value of them and halved the amount of land required to collect them . Many myself included took full advantage and kicked a lot of low margin rented ground back . The beauty of the scheme was the farmer not the landowner owned the entitlement and it was the gift that kept on giving . When the Cilos reforms started to flatten the entitlement value those of us with high value entitlements from stacking were severely hit
Over your side of the puddle whereas the Welsh and Scotch opted for the historic model like over here the English came up with a cunning plan called the dynamic hybrid to restore the entitlement value to landlords and make sure that tenants didnt get much advantage @glasshouse is the man who can explain how fischler reform should have worked until the CLA and the Gov got together to mininise the benefit to tenants . The British establishment has form when it comes to diluting european farmer support schemes so sadly no surprise .
The only thing wrong with the historic sfp was the lack of an ongoing reserve for new entrants.Only thing I would say is the historic system made it harder for new entrants did it not?
Years ago, I understand a lot of sewage sludge was applied to land in a largely untreated form, well, after it was de-watered at any rate. The stuff used today, if it's been through an AD system is a different beast.
Basically, the bacteria involved destroy or attack anything, even in conventional treatment works. The only thing they can't handle is heavy metals, which is less of an issue these days as there isn't as much heavy industry about and heavy metals are actually recycled or recovered because they are valuable. Of course, plastics are very inert but shouldn't be in the product as they are screened out.
The allowed application rate would be very small now compared to 30 yrs ago though.30 years ago we used to have the untreated stuff and my god it grew some fantastic crops. The treated stuff doesn’t produce anywhere near as good crops.
The allowed application rate would be very small now compared to 30 yrs ago though.
Our spreading rates vary from 28 down to 12. 5 tons per hectare.Yep. I can’t remember what rates were applied but it was annually rather than biannually as it is now.
That always amazed me because it was pushed for annual application then when they started charging for it they suddenly decided it should only be every other year.
Now it’s delivered free again so they are coming back to how it was years ago. Application rate today is 21t/ha.
The allowed application rate would be very small now compared to 30 yrs ago though.