Are you happy with the quality of the lime you purchase?

Written by James Warne from Soil First Farming

1641203951112.jpeg


A word of warning to all of you who buy bulk lime products. There appears to be nobody in the supply chain fighting your corner to ensure the quality of the lime you buy meets the legal requirements as laid down in the Fertiliser Regulations 1991. 100% of the bulk lime products we see tipped on farm does not meet these specifications in terms of particle size. Even if it’s being sold as screened lime it fails to make the specification. This low quality lime will not be able to neutralise soil acidity as quickly, or for as long, resulting in declining crop performance. I encourage everyone buying bulk lime products to take a sample from the delivered pile before spreading and get it tested for Neutralising Value (NV) and particle size distribution to make sure it meets to specifications of the product. The correct specification is given in the table below. If the analysis results show substandard product, talk to your supplier and send the results to the Aglime Association. It’s only by collective effort that we can encourage change. Always request ground agricultural lime from your supplier and put it in writing.

The Aglime Association, which represents lime producers, has launched its own assurance standard to ensure product consistency from the quarries. But why do we need another assurance standard when the supply requirements are laid down in law? I mention this topic regularly for good reason. Farmers are paying for sub-standard inputs which can be very costly, not only in the purchase and spreading price, but also the knock-on effects of reduced output. Low soil pH can negatively affect nitrogen use efficiency. With urea trading at ~£700/per tonne you need to ensure that you are maximizing its efficiency.

All ag-lime sold in the UK must meet the requirements of the Fertiliser Regulations 1991 to be sold as lime, for the purposes of this article I will look at limestone only, but these regulations also apply to dolomitic limestone, chalk and many other types of lime. The table below is taken from the Fertiliser Regulations.

1641203753728.png


Grind size

Don’t just buy on neutralising value, the particle size distribution is critical, almost more so. To put it in context, Lincoln Cathedral has a neutralising value, it’s built of limestone after all, but it won’t neutralise very mush due to the low surface area to volume ratio. Grind the stone to 150 micron and it will neutralise acid, provide plant available calcium and react well.

Once the levels start to decline the effectiveness of inputs also starts to decline and the return on investment declines alongside. The health of the crop suffers which results in an increase in inputs which are already under pressure. You can see this becomes an ever-decreasing circle of increased cost and decreasing output.

As mentioned above we now know that grind size is as important as neutralising value in determining whether the lime will actually do as intended. This is where the fertiliser Regulations 1991 become relevant because they set out the standards for lime quality as a fertiliser. If we consider these regulations for a moment it is clear that both the neutralising value and the specific material name must be given, in addition the percentage by weight passing through a 150 micron sieve must also be declared (the grind size). A limit of variation (tolerence) of 5% is allowed.

By grinding the rock finer we are increasing the surface area of the product. It is this increase in surface area which allows the lime to react faster and bring about quick reductions in soil acidity. If we calculate the degree of grinding and surface area we can see from the table below that ground limestone has a surface area nearly twice that of screened limestone, while prilled lime products can be four times the surface area of screened limstone. This increase will give greater reaction and therefore faster pH reduction.

1641203860783.png


So how fine does the rock need to be ground to be effective? The aglime website states that “coarser material requires a heavier application” and “There is a considerable reduction in the effectiveness of liming materials containing particles above 600 microns (0.60mm, 60 mesh) unless the material is easily broken down”. The finer the lime is ground, the more effective it becomes.

This is supported by work taken from North Carolina University in the US show below;

1641203886959.png


This graph clearly demonstrates that lime in the range of 0.177 – 0.150mm (177-150 micron or 80-100 mesh) gave the quickest pH rise and most sustained pH rise. The larger particle size 0.841mm and above gave a very limited pH increase and took 18 months to achieve it.

Focus on the detail of the basics and the output and profitability will follow. My advice to you is avoid buying bulk lime altogether because you cannot guarantee what you are going to receive and instead buy a guaranteed quality product such as a prilled lime which will work for you every time.
 

Bogweevil

Member
This low quality lime will not be able to neutralise soil acidity as quickly, or for as long, resulting in declining crop performance. - not as quickly agreed, but surely for longer as the larger particles will go on dissolving long after finer ones are all dissolved? In theory larger particles will have a prolonged effect but over a period that is uneconomic?

In the old days when we shovelled on 'lump chalk' and let the frost break it down the action was slow all right, but lasted decades. But we just dug the chalk from a nearby pit for only the the cost of labour.
 
I agree with some points you raise in the article about particle size etc but the article is tremendously misleading in the surface area graph m2 surface area etc as the spreading of pills is in the region of kgs ha whereas ground lime is in tonnes per ha applied so as I say very misleading
Whatever way you look at it Prills are a very expensive way of correcting ph and even more expensive way of maintaining ph
 
This low quality lime will not be able to neutralise soil acidity as quickly, or for as long, resulting in declining crop performance. - not as quickly agreed, but surely for longer as the larger particles will go on dissolving long after finer ones are all dissolved? In theory larger particles will have a prolonged effect but over a period that is uneconomic?

In the old days when we shovelled on 'lump chalk' and let the frost break it down the action was slow all right, but lasted decades. But we just dug the chalk from a nearby pit for only the the cost of labour.
Look at the graph how the larger particles start to raise it slowly. you are correct- I have done my own experiments and spoken to a geologist on the matter. Bellow 2mm most limestones will react but slowly, harder dales carboniferous stuff were talking 10-15 years to be used up - so their is merrit in them buffering - also they will react slowly at first as the H+ ion s react with the smaller more reactive fine lime first, they start to react, buffering the rising acidity as the PH drops 10 years after liming - so you still get the benefit, but as you say not in an economic way - so basically ignor the coase stuff but be happy its their - it means that if your heavy cutting your silage ground - you wont suddenly find in 3 years you plumet from PH 6. or so to 5.5 loosing loads of crop, once the fine lime is used, you will get a more gradual drop.
Bigger than 2mm is pointless as it seems to be around so long it gets covered in a layer of inert oxides and becomes unreactive (i put3mm + some in tubes of HCL and it was still their after 9 months when i binned them) .

Soft stuff like chalk is different - 5mm down stuff melts after a coupe of years in rain - so its a good option - and the OOlitic lime from malton ive used is great - its moderately hard but its highly reactive - 3mm particles dissolving in week acid in days - it seems to have a high affinity to react when PH is below 6, which is great because the larger bits kick in as your safety net.

Avoid Tarmac for lime - their ground lime looks and feels like pipe bedding, with less than 10% below 40 micron - its expensive and utterly crap- the rock is amazingly hard and used for road stone - its so hard and unreactive that 2-3mm particles cant be dissolved in HCL at 10mole in a week - that eats oolite in an hour and chalk in mins.
 

Latest Poll on TFF

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 15.1%
  • No

    Votes: 124 84.9%

JCB launches Fastrac ‘iCon’

  • 143
  • 0
Written by Charlotte Cunningham from CPM Magazine

JCB has launched new Fastrac 4000 and 8000 Series tractors with an all-new electronics infrastructure which is claimed to deliver higher levels of performance. According to JCB, the new Fastrac iCon operator environment has three key features: iConfigure – creating a bespoke control experience for every operator iConnect – integrating advanced precision agriculture technology iControl – redefining operation through new driveline software The 175hp to 348hp (133kW to 260kW) Fastracs feature the new iCon armrest console and touch-screen display to provide flexibility in operator allocation and operator information, as well as a new transmission control strategy to enhance operator comfort and powertrain efficiency, says the manufacturer...
Top