Hindsight
Member
- Location
- Lincolnshire
I presume Jim Mosely will be checking up on the manure credentials of imported food stuffs.
Haven't read this all but Only have a modest quantity of fym but spreading it in spring is completely impractical on our ground. Will have to start growing OSR!
Changed my cropping system first, then changed muck timing, not at the same time.Pick
Rpa have all field numbers.
Fields all have codes in for arable or grass
Just add box where farmer or lab can upload soil samples every five years.
Layer on these new forms.
Then bit of computers and joined up government.
Badaboom badabing. Nice govt it contract. Paid for by fines. Trebles all round ...except for us.
It has always been the way when dealing with the RPA, their need to make the soft natural world fit onto a spreadsheet. Is it a hedge, scrub or a line of trees? We always take our life in our hands when signing to confirm the information we have provided is accurate when much of it can't practically be measured and is always changing. Can the manure itself can be tested to prove it's low in nutrients, maybe using the cade lamb pen for the sample?Now Tesla. A lad parcel - is that a soil sample result for whole parcel? Or part of a parcel. A parcel (field) may have varying indices within it. Certainly I have data for Fen fields where changes from silt to organic clay loam with attendant change of index from 0 to 4 in space of a few metres. What about where parcels are sampled on a one hectare or smaller grid basis. Fun to be had here.
RT missed a trick here
All this regulation and they weren’t chosen to regulate it
Certainly I have data for Fen fields where changes from silt to organic clay loam with attendant change of index from 0 to 4 in space of a few metres.
Having consumed much of the morning looking into this I have found this BASIS/FACTS communication:
Having looked through it and checked in the MANNER-NPK program that FYM, even pig FYM, I think should be OK in front of a cereal providing P indices are 2 or below and your soil type and winter rainfall mean leaching losses stay below 5kgN/ha. The leaching per hectare can be reduced by reducing the total application rate if necessary. I am feeling slightly more relaxed at the moment, at least for my own situation; P indices being 2 or less are the key to autumn FYM spreading along with a nutrient management plan to back it up.
Forgive me i have this wrong so has the ban has come in yet or is it still in proposal form ?
So what are the implications for land where they have indices above 3 but it’s not available and the crop doesn’t utilise it?
Instead of just lobbing on a big heap of manure which is readily available (and leachable) what can those farmers do to release what they have?
So long as the winter is dry else those heaps will be causing pollution issues from runoff....I am interested to see what will happen with the sludge heaps sitting in fields round here this autumn - it seems to me that it is already in storage so it will have to wait until the spring?
Am I slow catching up or is that the first time we've seen a recommendation to incorporate manufactured fertilisers?Applying organic manure and manufactured fertiliser to agricultural land
(4) Without limiting what may otherwise be done to comply with paragraph (3), examples of reasonable precautions include—
(b)incorporating organic manure and manufactured fertiliser into the soil within 12 hours of, or as soon as possible after, its application, and