Bedding emissions?

TommT

Member
Livestock Farmer
Does bedding with straw rather than slats lower or raise the emissions calculations when the production, haulage and disposal of the extra organic material created is taken into account
 

TommT

Member
Livestock Farmer
Which is better for the environment- adding straw to the equation or just the separated solids/liquids never mind the financial.
 

TommT

Member
Livestock Farmer
I dare say it matters where the straw has come from. The field next to the cattle shed or a field 200 miles away.
Just trying to figure out if there has been any work or studies done on adding the bedding materials to swell the amount of manure to be broken down against the pure product like say from below sheep/calf slats not actual slurry
 

delilah

Member
There's 101 variables, the system needs to suit the farm, you can't go changing the farm to suit what is perceived to be a 'better' system.

What you can say, is that whichever system you choose you aren't going to be contributing to climate change. Anyone tells you different, tell them to do one.
 

TommT

Member
Livestock Farmer
I have a small flock of 70 ewes and permanent pasture. I'm considering slats.
I have to buy in all the straw/bedding and pay to have it spread back out again on the land.
Manure from slats would be alot less to spread and no straw to buy- must be better?
Price of the slats to consider too.
 

Muddyroads

Member
NFFN Member
Location
Exeter, Devon
It’s impossible to be really precise on emissions, there are just too many variables. If you’re looking at it from a carbon audit perspective, your fossil fuel use over the year will be a major part of it. It will go up if you start an activity like straw chopping, but the extra carbon that you then incorporate into your soil also needs to be considered.
In comparison to the levels of emissions produced by most businesses, any increase will be an extremely small drop in the ocean.
 

puppet

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
sw scotland
Our bought-in straw has counted against our carbon emissions just like fertiliser and feed. I would argue that the arable farmer is losing carbon and I am gaining but what do I know.
I have a small flock of 70 ewes and permanent pasture. I'm considering slats.
I have to buy in all the straw/bedding and pay to have it spread back out again on the land.
Manure from slats would be alot less to spread and no straw to buy- must be better?
Price of the slats to consider too.
As my comments above, introducing someone else's organic matter will help your farm. You will know how much straw you use and the contractors charges and I suspect the price of slats and fitting them will take many years to recoup.
You could always lamb more outside
 

Wood field

Member
Livestock Farmer
In our case , bedded sheep and a few cows on straw . Straw from our regular supplier ( he grows it) in or near Pontefract, so an hour by road plus whatever he’s done to get the crop.
My neighbour said thats a lot of money in straw , but I have a heap of fym as big as a bungalow to spread
We don’t tend to use artificial fert but I would hazard a guess our system is more carbon friendly or whatever the buzzword is
But as @delilah says , we have nothing to answer for , so tell them to do one
 

TommT

Member
Livestock Farmer
It's in-house .
Only straw available here is near £100 a bale from GB
Government grant of 50% on the slats opening 8th March in England but none where I live in NI .
To wet to lamb outside.
 

DaveGrohl

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Cumbria
Our bought-in straw has counted against our carbon emissions just like fertiliser and feed. I would argue that the arable farmer is losing carbon and I am gaining but what do I know.

As my comments above, introducing someone else's organic matter will help your farm. You will know how much straw you use and the contractors charges and I suspect the price of slats and fitting them will take many years to recoup.
You could always lamb more outside
And you’d be absolutely right. But the reality is it’s carbon cycling which is pretty much carbon neutral of itself, so neither of you should be "penalised". The only actual emissions taking place are the burning of diesel in whatever way.

If veg rotting in a field, because a supermarket has cancelled an order, suddenly becomes a farm emission, why is that the farmer’s problem? The supermarket should bear all of those "emissions" because they created the potential problem in the first place. But that’s not how this nonsense pans out is it?

The accounting rules are upside down frankly. That’s the real issue.
 

Scholsey

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Herefordshire
Whilst the rest of the world sleep easy, dreaming of their next holiday to Barbados, a man in Ireland frets over his renewable, recyclable, sustainable 10,000 year proven business

People flying around the world on holidays just so can take some nice photos to put on social media, the entire world of motorsports and the whole ‘fast fashion’ industry carry on exactly how it was yet we as food producers are scratting about trying to save a few grams/co2 per kg of beef/wheat/milk, madness.
 

egbert

Member
Livestock Farmer
Forget any of the guff about carbon in the straw/manure.
that's all short cycle stuff, and irrelevant...whatever 'they' say.

The only bit that really matters is what fossil fuel is burnt to carry out either system.
Making the slats- unless they're wooden - will be a chunk.
Hauling straw must burn some fuel -esp if it's coming across the water.

If you're serious, and your hands are tied by geography, start looking at growing crop for bedding - even just cutting late hay to bed through a chopper?
(and we're already straying into the absurd again....)

Lamb later, outdoors.

still too wet?
If your ground just won't carry outdoor sheep in winter....should you keep them?
Should you be growing sitka/rice/carp?
 

L P

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Newbury
People flying around the world on holidays just so can take some nice photos to put on social media, the entire world of motorsports and the whole ‘fast fashion’ industry carry on exactly how it was yet we as food producers are scratting about trying to save a few grams/co2 per kg of beef/wheat/milk, madness.
Ah, but they saved the world by driving to the airport in an EV and the Colombian coffee was in a recyclable cup.
 

L P

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Newbury
I've got a great proposal for cutting farm emissions, sorting the housing crisis, road congestion, world wide emissions way below net zero, in one year, expontially increasing farm profit to boot. Cut worldwide food production by 2/3... its so simple and anyone worrying about funding the transitional period, fear not, gov are funding the first 25% reduction in SFI.
 

Scholsey

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Herefordshire
I've got a great proposal for cutting farm emissions, sorting the housing crisis, road congestion, world wide emissions way below net zero, in one year, expontially increasing farm profit to boot. Cut worldwide food production by 2/3... it’s so simple and anyone worrying about funding the transitional period, fear not, gov are funding the first 25% reduction in SFI.

Farmers communicating internationally and
working together would be more powerful than any government and could bring every multinational to its knees, we just have governments making sure we work against each other rather than with.
 

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 70 32.0%
  • no

    Votes: 149 68.0%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 14,922
  • 234
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top