M-J-G
Member
It's quite a thing when it's in it's transport position. It wouldn't be the first one to break a headstock.
A rotunde will do the job but it's a machine that requires patience and a certain amount of skill. There's no set forward or pto speeds, you have to vary them to suit the crop.
A twin rotor rake would be better and would put 3 into 1 which always leaves a nicer tow than 2 into 1, but the cost could be difficult to justify. A single rotor rake might not work that well putting 8fts together if it's for a round baler because you really need to be setting 2 narrow rows side by side rather one, potentially uneven row.
There's only so much you can do with an uneven row if it's the width of the pick up. 2 narrow rows set side by side out of a single rotor rake makes a better bale than 1 wide row.Not to much of an issue for the right man on the baler, give me a wider row that's a tad uneven than follow a haybob any day of the week. Spent years running after one and it drove me nuts.
We got a old class liner 680 last year would never ever go back to a single rotor and it was cheap
Our round baler prefers the biger rows and the drag chopper runs a lot smoother compared to putting 2 single rotor rows togetherWe had one for a couple years. Great machine but far too big in our heavy crops. Baler didn't like it and going down the gears meant to took longer to get over the field... and it still choked
Traded in for a Claas 450 single rotor. It is a pain having to remove the arms to transport (but it does go through 12' gates if you just put the swath board up ), it's a very good machine
Haybob
Our round baler prefers the biger rows and the drag chopper runs a lot smoother compared to putting 2 single rotor rows together
We got a old class liner 680 last year would never ever go back to a single rotor and it was cheap[/QUOTE
We’ve got the same, it replaced an old fransgard 5000 years ago, it does a great job. Twin rotor rake definitely the best but also the dearest