Coximus
Member
As with all these things - look at the countries with a less serious problem - for a start they remove the market, they make the buyer equaliy liable - so no one sane would want to risk buying a chainsaw, digger etc without seeing previous purchase proof first.
And reverting back to my student study days.... I remmeber studying about a pilot scheme in Germany whereby they made it default that the police seized anything suspect, where as here, they go to the guy with the stolen tractor, or in my case trailer, he says "I brought it" the police say they cant seize without a warrent, 3 days later when they have it, they go back, an lo and behold the trailer is sold on, moved etc....
In Germany, it gets seized as evidence, they have 7 days to proove it was stolen or they have to give it back, but you must be able to proove you purchased it a) in good faith, b) that you saw evidence the seller had it legally (IE joint liability).
If not it goes back to the person whom claims it was stolen from, as long as they prove both a & b.
makes the market shrink, reducing thefts.
And reverting back to my student study days.... I remmeber studying about a pilot scheme in Germany whereby they made it default that the police seized anything suspect, where as here, they go to the guy with the stolen tractor, or in my case trailer, he says "I brought it" the police say they cant seize without a warrent, 3 days later when they have it, they go back, an lo and behold the trailer is sold on, moved etc....
In Germany, it gets seized as evidence, they have 7 days to proove it was stolen or they have to give it back, but you must be able to proove you purchased it a) in good faith, b) that you saw evidence the seller had it legally (IE joint liability).
If not it goes back to the person whom claims it was stolen from, as long as they prove both a & b.
makes the market shrink, reducing thefts.