ritchiekirkland
Member
Break an anvilBomb proof tractors need bomb proof drivers imo , my old man could bend a railway track
Break an anvilBomb proof tractors need bomb proof drivers imo , my old man could bend a railway track
I still run a 956 - not up to modern standards of comfort and ergonomics, obviously, but pretty respectable for its age.A few minutes, have you driven one recently? see my comment above on chocolate transmissions too
Are the MX totally Case, before New Holland became involved?The "bombproof" ones are making daft money. Personally id go newer for not much more money, just go basic spec, manual spools etc. Have owned a case mx and nh tm and both of them had more issues than our puma and t7 have had at the same hours. The upgrade in comfort is huge tho.
I guarantee in 10yrs everyone will say remember the old pumas and t7 they were bombproof if only we kept them.
Totally agree with this, some of the heaps listed as reliable make me cringe, even imagining driving them, god knows how reliable they will be at the ages there at now with drying up oil seals and the like! Plus parts none existent,The "bombproof" ones are making daft money. Personally id go newer for not much more money, just go basic spec, manual spools etc. Have owned a case mx and nh tm and both of them had more issues than our puma and t7 have had at the same hours. The upgrade in comfort is huge tho.
I guarantee in 10yrs everyone will say remember the old pumas and t7 they were bombproof if only we kept them.
Someone will know better than me but i think so, theres not much similarities between and mx and a nh. Once you go mxm and later parts are interchangeableAre the MX totally Case, before New Holland became involved?
The ironic thing is everyone obsesses over the older tractors yet mocks the early t6 and t7's for example as NH didn't move on and basically kept rehashing the same old basic tractor in new clothes. There comes a point where age has to be a factor and you'll struggle to find really good examples as age will take its toll.The "bombproof" ones are making daft money. Personally id go newer for not much more money, just go basic spec, manual spools etc. Have owned a case mx and nh tm and both of them had more issues than our puma and t7 have had at the same hours. The upgrade in comfort is huge tho.
I guarantee in 10yrs everyone will say remember the old pumas and t7 they were bombproof if only we kept them.
A mx is basically a 51 series maxxum in a party frock,so it’s a caseAre the MX totally Case, before New Holland became involved?
Ummmm no.. our mtx135 is Cummins.The biggest difference is the McCormick MTX has a Perkins engine, whereas the MX has a Cummins
Lol at the party frock comment, finally the old Davie Broon esqe Explorer cab got put to bed!
What models and power were the 5100 series?A mx is basically a 51 series maxxum in a party frock,so it’s a case
McCormick mtx series is basically the same tractor bar a few mods and upgrades.
MXM series maxxum was a red TM,I think the CNH merger was around the millennium.
we got a lot of parts for ours from the new Holland dealer as it was closer than the case dealer.
From memoryWhat models and power were the 5100 series?
Was it rabbit damage again?It’s actually going back together quite nicely at the moment. I seen a video of the progress
Was it rabbit damage again?