Calving Ease of Herd

Turkish_FR

Member
Mixed Farmer
Hey, I am amateur and I dont have cattle but I have some a few million questions.

Calving ease is substantially equated to calf size and pelvic area size. Small frame calves will be relatively small frame cows in the future and small frame cows will have relatively smaller pelvic size. So trying to improve calving ease of herd by choosing sire breeds with easy calving feature or maternal calving ease feature is useless in long term. (Please think about what I mean)

Therefore I conclude that a herd would only improve within itself and would balance itself in long term. Outside intervention such as using sperma sold by vets or genetic companies will just decrease the performance of herd, with each new intervention the herd will try to balance itself according to new genetics transferred and the disappointed herd owner will use more foreign genetics hoping he/she will have the perfect herd one day in the future.



What do you think ? Do you agree with me ? Why ? Why not ?
 
Hey, I am amateur and I dont have cattle but I have some a few million questions.

Calving ease is substantially equated to calf size and pelvic area size. Small frame calves will be relatively small frame cows in the future and small frame cows will have relatively smaller pelvic size. So trying to improve calving ease of herd by choosing sire breeds with easy calving feature or maternal calving ease feature is useless in long term. (Please think about what I mean)

Therefore I conclude that a herd would only improve within itself and would balance itself in long term. Outside intervention such as using sperma sold by vets or genetic companies will just decrease the performance of herd, with each new intervention the herd will try to balance itself according to new genetics transferred and the disappointed herd owner will use more foreign genetics hoping he/she will have the perfect herd one day in the future.



What do you think ? Do you agree with me ? Why ? Why not ?
If you choose your bulls using estimated breeding values, then possible to use one with short gestation length/low birth weight, good figure for direct calving ease (how easily his calves are born) and maternal calving ease (how easily his daughters will calve). The yanks call a bull with low birth weights and high growth a 'curve bender' but they are out there. Off the top of my head, the Aberdeen Angus bull Oakchurch Duster exhibits all these traits. Google him.
 

Turkish_FR

Member
Mixed Farmer
If you choose your bulls using estimated breeding values, then possible to use one with short gestation length/low birth weight, good figure for direct calving ease (how easily his calves are born) and maternal calving ease (how easily his daughters will calve). The yanks call a bull with low birth weights and high growth a 'curve bender' but they are out there. Off the top of my head, the Aberdeen Angus bull Oakchurch Duster exhibits all these traits. Google him.


- Look at his table, he has above average "calving ease" feature due to smaller calf size.

- He has under average "mature cow size" feature due to smaller birth weight.

- While his daugters are under average size, how come his maternal calving ease is marked as above average ? Is it not contradictory ?
 

Attachments

  • sense.png
    sense.png
    34.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
- Look at his table, he has above average "calving ease" feature due to smaller calf size.

- He have under average "mature cow size" feature due to smaller birth weight.

- While his daugters are under average size, how come his maternal calving ease is marked as above average ? Is it not contradictory ?
Not necessarily. While those cows will be smaller, they may have a larger pelvis when mature. They will pass on his trait of low birthweight/short gestation period to their calves.
 

beefandsleep

Member
Location
Staffordshire
As a finisher I would rather have a pure stabiliser steer than a pure saler as in my experience they have far more growth and are easily finished. Salers seem to hang around forever despite the fact they come in looking like fantastic lean hairy good framed stores. The few stabilisers I’ve calved as heifers needed no assistance and their calves grew well at 1.2 kg/day on grass and milk. They eat f all and are always well fleshed. I’m looking forward to calving them again this year. Did I mention they have very good tempers.
 

tr250

Member
Location
Northants
As a finisher I would rather have a pure stabiliser steer than a pure saler as in my experience they have far more growth and are easily finished. Salers seem to hang around forever despite the fact they come in looking like fantastic lean hairy good framed stores. The few stabilisers I’ve calved as heifers needed no assistance and their calves grew well at 1.2 kg/day on grass and milk. They eat f all and are always well fleshed. I’m looking forward to calving them again this year. Did I mention they have very good tempers.
I agree salers do tend to be leaner but they finnish at biggish weights where I think a stabiliser heifer in particular would go fat very light. And I’m not convinced a stabiliser cow will calve to a charalais like a saler will but I’m a biased saler man
 

beefandsleep

Member
Location
Staffordshire
Yes, they finish at bigger weights but they take forever to get there. The Charolais out of salers I’ve fed have been great animals though, I’ve just been disappointed so many times by saler bullocks that I don’t touch them now.
It seems also that 400kg steers are no longer wanted.
 

tr250

Member
Location
Northants
Yes, they finish at bigger weights but they take forever to get there. The Charolais out of salers I’ve fed have been great animals though, I’ve just been disappointed so many times by saler bullocks that I don’t touch them now.
It seems also that 400kg steers are no longer wanted.
We Finnish our males entire so probably a bit different as bulls. We have just bought a new saler stock bull and bought the most fleshed one we could find as it’s a problem that needs addressing in my opinion
 

Blaithin

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Alberta
Size doesn’t matter so much as shape. Many calving ease bulls are known for narrow shoulders. Doesn’t matter so much if the calf is 110 lbs if it’s shaped well to come out. be 80lbs lbs and shaped like a brick and you can have more issues than a honker with the right shape.

Mature size or smaller frame also doesn’t necessarily mean poor calving. Here Jerseys are known for their large pelvic openings and are actually used to ET Charolais calves. Despite being small framed and having small, dainty calves, they can manage some of the largest, worst calving ease calves I’ve seen.

This is why pelvic measurements are becoming more popular. You can’t judge a cow by what her frame looks like from the exterior.

Your logic that smaller frame cows will have smaller frame calves which will lead to even smaller frame adults doesn’t lend itself to the idea of a herd balancing itself. It lends itself to the fact that the cows would eventually evolve into a herd of miniatures. Without either the influx of fresh genetics or the appearance of a new genetic trait involving size the herd would continue to shrink.

Bison as a whole are larger than cattle. They also have much wider shoulders and neck than mature cattle. However their calves are small, torpedo shaped and easily spat out. This does not reflect in fragile, small framed adults.

Also a large contributing factor to calving ease and mature size is plane of nutrition. This is why populations with easy access to large amounts of food tend to be larger while sub populations - like those on islands - that have lower planes of nutrition, tend to shrink in size. They adapt to their food. If you have small framed animals and still fed them well, they won’t necessarily stay small framed and tiny. Eventually large genetics will begin expressing themselves as long as the nutrition supports it.

No isolated population will balance itself. Even if you don’t introduce new genetics yourself, Nature will do it all on its own.
 

Turkish_FR

Member
Mixed Farmer
Size doesn’t matter so much as shape. Many calving ease bulls are known for narrow shoulders. Doesn’t matter so much if the calf is 110 lbs if it’s shaped well to come out. be 80lbs lbs and shaped like a brick and you can have more issues than a honker with the right shape.

Calf with a narrow shoulder is going to be relatively smaller body frame cow/bull in the future compared to wider shoulder calf of similar body weight.

Mature size or smaller frame also doesn’t necessarily mean poor calving. Here Jerseys are known for their large pelvic openings and are actually used to ET Charolais calves. Despite being small framed and having small, dainty calves, they can manage some of the largest, worst calving ease calves I’ve seen.

This is why pelvic measurements are becoming more popular. You can’t judge a cow by what her frame looks like from the exterior.

If this was true, there would be genetics sold by companies that has over average easy calving feature but also has over average mature body weight feature. There is no such genetics. All easy calvers has under average mature size, is not it ?

If you have a bigger head than me, you will probably have a bigger mouth than me as well. So I think large frame cows are much more prone to have larger pelvic area. The herd owner just need to select and improve the herd in this manner instead of introducing foreign genetics to the herd.

Your logic that smaller frame cows will have smaller frame calves which will lead to even smaller frame adults doesn’t lend itself to the idea of a herd balancing itself. It lends itself to the fact that the cows would eventually evolve into a herd of miniatures. Without either the influx of fresh genetics or the appearance of a new genetic trait involving size the herd would continue to shrink.

I claim that easy calving feature will lead smaller frame cows in a herd and smaller body frame cows will still have similar rate of calving problems, you may have easy calving in F1 but there will be no change in next next generations, I believe.

Bison as a whole are larger than cattle. They also have much wider shoulders and neck than mature cattle. However their calves are small, torpedo shaped and easily spat out. This does not reflect in fragile, small framed adults.

....No isolated population will balance itself. Even if you don’t introduce new genetics yourself, Nature will do it all on its own......

Bison herds are isolated populations ! Good example for a herd balanced to an optimum.


Also a large contributing factor to calving ease and mature size is plane of nutrition. This is why populations with easy access to large amounts of food tend to be larger while sub populations - like those on islands - that have lower planes of nutrition, tend to shrink in size. They adapt to their food. If you have small framed animals and still fed them well, they won’t necessarily stay small framed and tiny. Eventually large genetics will begin expressing themselves as long as the nutrition supports it.


Secondary factor
 

Blaithin

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Alberta
Bison populations are not isolated... many people breed bison just like they would breed any other livestock.

Also your assumption that you haven’t seen any animal that has higher than average mature size because they're calving ease is faulty.

1. Just because you haven’t seen it it must not exist.
2.1 What are you considering average weight? A calving ease Chianina (massive breed btw, fairly good calving ease if I recall) will still outperform a calving ease Angus if your only comparison is directly referencing calf size vs mature size. Same could be said for most commercial Bos Indicus breeds. Known for easy calving yet massive mature animals. Talk to any Australian who has nothing to do with their station herd of Brahmans.
2.2. There has been a marked shift towards smaller cattle compared to the giant continentals that were popular at the turn of the century. A smaller cow can be more efficient and easily wean a calf 60% of her weight. A larger cow cannot. Has your research taken this shift in size of mature animal goals into consideration.

Many producers are no longer aiming for 1600lb + animals. However I can assure you with that secondary factor of feed you can get a consistent finished product of animals around 1500 lbs easily before they’re 2. Give them longer and they’d be larger.
 
Last edited:

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 102 41.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 90 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 36 14.6%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 10 4.1%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 819
  • 13
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top