What's the best free software currently available to calculate the dreaded footprint?
What's the best free software currently available to calculate the dreaded footprint?
We're carbon negative here, and always have been, but to profit from this it seems we shall need to put all the data into a "pdf" format, whatever that may be.
But how to convert acres of trees and hedges and crops and tonnes of fertilizer into net carbon?You can just type your stuff into word and convert the document into a PDF file to email off? You don't need any serious software to do this?
I did one of these I came across on the net. I dont go on holiday, do very little mileage in an elderly car, dont change household appliances, grow my own food, dont use much electricity etc etc.
Apparently my carbon footprint was high because I eat beef and dairy. The beef comes from just outside and the dairy from the nearby town. I was much higher than someone who ate avocado, drank soya milk, and flew to hot places once a year. I would say it is all bo**ocks but that would now be considered sexist...
Does it deal with cyclical methane correctly?https://coolfarmtool.org/ is good, but doesn't take into account sequestration if you've livestock
Excellent.Get our own calculator up and running
That calculator seems a bit one sided, I accept when I buy in diesel I buy in carbon but what fertiliser do you buy in that contains carbon? You didn't produce the fertiliser should your calculation take responsibility for the emissions generated in its production or should they belong squarely at the manufacturer? If we are to take reponsiblity for carbon upstream the calculator must also credit for the carbon that we have sequestered in the products leaving our farms, 400kg of carbon in a tonne of wheat... just have to pity the poor producer who then has to take the responsibility of the carbon emissions from the consumption of this grain!But how to convert acres of trees and hedges and crops and tonnes of fertilizer into net carbon?
Seems to work the other way round in electricity generation - Drax burns millions of tons of imported woodchip but drew £800m of taxpayers' money last year for being carbon neutral.t... just have to pity the poor producer who then has to take the responsibility of the carbon emissions from the consumption of this grain!
Everyone arranged the furniture with whatever calculator they can get away with!Seems to work the other way round in electricity generation - Drax burns millions of tons of imported woodchip but drew £800m of taxpayers' money last year for being carbon neutral.
I’ve just been reading about drax and I find it very confusing, it was saying wood is dirtier than coal apart from offsetting the woodSeems to work the other way round in electricity generation - Drax burns millions of tons of imported woodchip but drew £800m of taxpayers' money last year for being carbon neutral.
It's surely high time for some, admittedly rather difficult, actuarial honesty finally to break to the surface on "offset".I’ve just been reading about drax and I find it very confusing, it was saying wood is dirtier than coal apart from offsetting the wood
who do you believe with all these predictions?
who do you believe with all these predictions?
Nobody at present. The science and the calculations will change. We have become fixated on Co2 for its role in trapping heat which will not work if 10 billion keep producing the heat.
I should like to.You can work it out yourself.