Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Carbon footprint /offset
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N.Yorks." data-source="post: 7893686" data-attributes="member: 46426"><p>Your counter claims are really at odds with the research findings that are ongoing....... utter stupidity!!</p><p></p><p>The jury is very much out in terms of net GHG emissions from soil and the current evidence is starting to nudge the verdict towards the view that you won't be able to manage all soils to the extent that they will have zero net contribution to GHG emissions. You can certainly manage them to decrease the emissions, so like most things there is less bad and bad management outcomes.</p><p></p><p>Carbon and nitrogen cycling through soils emits these gases naturally and to claim agricultural soil management is up to the job of actually contributing to reducing GHG emissions to the extent that you can sell the benefit to polluting industries is scandalous. This is more than just carbon and I would ask you to stop framing this all around carbon, it should be total GHG emissions from CO2, CH4 and NO2.</p><p></p><p>Doing otherwise is plain wrong and immoral!! I wonder if trading standards should be asked to have a look at this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N.Yorks., post: 7893686, member: 46426"] Your counter claims are really at odds with the research findings that are ongoing....... utter stupidity!! The jury is very much out in terms of net GHG emissions from soil and the current evidence is starting to nudge the verdict towards the view that you won't be able to manage all soils to the extent that they will have zero net contribution to GHG emissions. You can certainly manage them to decrease the emissions, so like most things there is less bad and bad management outcomes. Carbon and nitrogen cycling through soils emits these gases naturally and to claim agricultural soil management is up to the job of actually contributing to reducing GHG emissions to the extent that you can sell the benefit to polluting industries is scandalous. This is more than just carbon and I would ask you to stop framing this all around carbon, it should be total GHG emissions from CO2, CH4 and NO2. Doing otherwise is plain wrong and immoral!! I wonder if trading standards should be asked to have a look at this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Carbon footprint /offset
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top