Yep, saw that, and the US press don't quite seem to have swallowed the vegan codswallop to the same extent as ours, prob because they love their beef over there. But I don't think putting the message across that grass faming can stop climate change in its tracks is going to do anyone any good, because no amount of natural sequestration is going to solve the fossil fuels already burnt and continuing to be burnt. Good to see farmers painted in a good light by a national newspaper though.New York Times today published an article. They're pretty convinced that cattle can help sort this carbon sequestration.
A Different Kind of Land Management: Let the Cows Stomp https://nyti.ms/37mefc4
As was said earlier, the issue seems to be more in the mindsets of those who wish to manage and have control.
The cattle themselves are not actually the problem.
"Biden administration, in its initial moves to combat climate change, has cited agriculture as a “linchpin” of its strategy. One idea is to allocate $1 billion to pay farmers $20 for each ton of carbon they trap in the soil.”
Last edited: