@glasshouse sounds like he needed the sub more than you and I , sold 1000 acre to clear debts and making a loss, you said he didn’t need it looks like he did.Subsidies are a joke, says Walston
He's blunt, outspoken and believes farmers are getting too much help from the taxpayers. Mairéad McGuinness meets the controversial Oliver Walstonamp.independent.ie
He said he didnt need it@glasshouse sounds like he needed the sub more than you and I , sold 1000 acre to clear debts and making a loss, you said he didn’t need it looks like he did.
No need to be nasty now, he was right imo .He said he didnt need it
But the brain wasnt connected
If the uk govt hadnt threatened the veto, iacs payments would have stopped at 300 acres, so it was all down to whitehall that he got the massive dubNo need to be nasty now, he was right imo .
To be fair that article was downright rude and a bit childish.No need to be nasty now, he was right imo .
YesSeem to remember Peter Hepworth tried to manage without payments for a while but decided he was depriving his family and joined in. Might have been when IACS came in. Anyone remember this?
Yes, my recollection is that he initially declared that there would never be so much as a single acre of setaside on the farm.....Seem to remember Peter Hepworth tried to manage without payments for a while but decided he was depriving his family and joined in. Might have been when IACS came in. Anyone remember this?
They were not aloneYes, my recollection is that he initially declared that there would never be so much as a single acre of setaside on the farm.....
To be fair to the man, I was saying exactly the same thing at that time.
I think he didn’t claim IACS for the first 2 years.Seem to remember Peter Hepworth tried to manage without payments for a while but decided he was depriving his family and joined in. Might have been when IACS came in. Anyone remember this?
Regards the OP. Are we drawing the parallel between Mr Hepworth and Mr Bailye being regarded as leading lights, and before their time; or their being rather fond of their own puff, and incapable of accepting that they may be wrong?
its all about opinion, we all have our own and it will be a sad day when we dont. nobody is always right and hopfully always wrong! hepworth wasnt right all the time , although he often was but i never heard him say when he did get it wrong.Regards the OP. Are we drawing the parallel between Mr Hepworth and Mr Bailye being regarded as leading lights, and before their time; or their being rather fond of their own puff, and incapable of accepting that they may be wrong?
Exellent ! Thanks .Interesting video of Oliver's son
Showing us his new grain store & a new design of combine a axial flow. Incredible yeilds of 3 ton of barley & a totally amazing 4 ton of wheat, variety Norman. A more average 14 ton/acre sugar beet,
I think his claims of hardship were exaggerated for effect. When Oliver Walston said he lost money, that was after paying himself a pretty decent rent. I think the sale of 1000 acres might really have been to buy out siblings after his father died as was the earlier sale and leaseback of much of the rest of the farm to a pension fund (which he later repurchased).@glasshouse sounds like he needed the sub more than you and I , sold 1000 acre to clear debts and making a loss, you said he didn’t need it looks like he did.