- Location
- Lincolnshire
It's an affront. As our vicar used to say, before we got a PC one, "Forgive them, it will do more at them than holding a grudge".
So what really happened to your nephews?
Might be more fun to say nought and leave them guessing.I would like to take issue with those commenting on this thread with "You should read it", "It's a good book" or "you might learn something"
I didn't intend this thread to become some sort of TFF Book Club.
Had this publication come up in general discussion as a recommended read, I may well have taken a look. The issue I am trying to highlight is the way in which it was delivered. Unlabelled. At Christmas. To my aging parents.
A coward clearly trying to send a message. As I said earlier, we have a pretty good idea who sent it and I wouldn't be surprised if our farming neighbour also received one.
When I see said suspect, I shall wish him a Happy New Year and cheerfully than him for the gift. The twit.
Might be more fun to say nought and leave them guessing.
You put T W U N T didnt you ??Hmmm. Twit isn't what I typed. What I REALLY wanted to put DEFINITELY wouldn't have made it through the swear filter.
yes and he is not aloneTrainee farmer by name @traineefarmer by nature....you have much to learn my friend!
I would like to take issue with those commenting on this thread with "You should read it", "It's a good book" or "you might learn something"
I didn't intend this thread to become some sort of TFF Book Club.
Had this publication come up in general discussion as a recommended read, I may well have taken a look. The issue I am trying to highlight is the way in which it was delivered. Unlabelled. At Christmas. To my aging parents.
A coward clearly trying to send a message. As I said earlier, we have a pretty good idea who sent it and I wouldn't be surprised if our farming neighbour also received one.
When I see said suspect, I shall wish him a Happy New Year and cheerfully than him for the gift. The twit.
Society is too well off at present (by and large ) to worry about food availability ! How things can change !!And if rewilding happens on a large scale and much land generates no tax revenue whatsoever but just soaks up public funds, who pays for schools and hospitals?
If farming is lost, then so is a a lot of the supply industry with yet more people out of productive work and not paying taxes.
Then more food is imported, more environmental destruction out of sight out of mind abroad.
Rewilding is an indulgence of westerners who have lost understanding of the fundamentals of how human society works.
We can and do already farm reasonably efficiently and while doing evermore to help the environment.
Don't let these loonies destroy your confidence and wreck farming.
Crack on and leave them behind, stewing in their own juice.
In my opinion hypocritical do gooders in society are increasing at an alarming rate, as everyone wants to do their bit for society, but then turning round and enjoying 21st century living . To undo our pollution of the planet will never happen at this rate, as surely the ever increasing world population will be polluting the planet for decades to come,but perhaps bit more slowly than we are now.And then want to save the planet and plant a tree???
Personally, when I say I might learn something, I mean literally that, and don't intend any slight on you. There's always opportunities to increase your knowledge if you want to.I would like to take issue with those commenting on this thread with "You should read it", "It's a good book" or "you might learn something"
I didn't intend this thread to become some sort of TFF Book Club.
Had this publication come up in general discussion as a recommended read, I may well have taken a look. The issue I am trying to highlight is the way in which it was delivered. Unlabelled. At Christmas. To my aging parents.
A coward clearly trying to send a message. As I said earlier, we have a pretty good idea who sent it and I wouldn't be surprised if our farming neighbour also received one.
When I see said suspect, I shall wish him a Happy New Year and cheerfully than him for the gift. The twit.
This is my problem with it.As far as I see it, the Knepp Estate have been able to indulge their ideas because they've received shed loads of CAP subsidies which by rights they should not have been eligible for. BPS is for land kept in GAEC, and thats specifically NOT what they were aiming for. Only because they have the connections/first mover advantage have they been able to get the powers that be to agree to a large Environmental Scheme AND keep their BPS on top. This amount of public subsidy is never going to be available to everyone, so it ill behoves them to champion their ideas from the roof tops when its almost guaranteed that they are the only people who will ever be able to get such a generous deal. Personally if I'd been receiving the thick end of £500k/yr from the tax payer for doing absolutely nothing (other than owning a capital asset worth the thick part of £50m) I'd be keeping pretty quiet about it, not writing books about how wonderful I am.
Incidentally as I've got no crops in at all at the moment, and am contemplating leaving the whole lot fallow until next autumn, can I not top it all next summer on the grounds that if GAEC does not apply to Knepp, why should it apply to me either?
As far as I see it, the Knepp Estate have been able to indulge their ideas because they've received shed loads of CAP subsidies which by rights they should not have been eligible for. BPS is for land kept in GAEC, and thats specifically NOT what they were aiming for. Only because they have the connections/first mover advantage have they been able to get the powers that be to agree to a large Environmental Scheme AND keep their BPS on top. This amount of public subsidy is never going to be available to everyone, so it ill behoves them to champion their ideas from the roof tops when its almost guaranteed that they are the only people who will ever be able to get such a generous deal. Personally if I'd been receiving the thick end of £500k/yr from the tax payer for doing absolutely nothing (other than owning a capital asset worth the thick part of £50m) I'd be keeping pretty quiet about it, not writing books about how wonderful I am.
Incidentally as I've got no crops in at all at the moment, and am contemplating leaving the whole lot fallow until next autumn, can I not top it all next summer on the grounds that if GAEC does not apply to Knepp, why should it apply to me either?