surely its end users and producers, wanting to buy at the lowest and sell at the highest? which is absolutely fair enough.
If a trader tells the mill it doesn't stack up at a price, but another trader is prepared to sell at that price, what is the end user to do?
C B
About time farms started merging with some rapidity. Forget waiting to buy your neighbour and start talking about how you can merge them together. Until we buck up and work out how to work together with some degree of seriousness then we will always be bottom of the chain.
There is such a business - it's called Openfield
Completely agree that third party credit risk is a significant risk to your business. It doesn't automatically follow that you should avoid smaller businesses as a consequence.
Do you due diligence, look at accounts on Companies House. A well established business with good management, a track record of profitability and necessary credit insurance is possibly more secure than a UK offshoot of a multi national. The accounts will certainly be more transparent.
I was thinking more farmers actually merging their farming businesses, rather than grain co-ops. It is fairly easy for a merchant or chem firm to buy another - their relative capital value compared to turnover and profit are quite small. The opposite is true for farming - even adding 50% more land to a farm in terms of asset purchase may be a once-in-a-lifetime thing. I'd like to see more farmers in the same area sitting down and actualy joining their businesses together to reduce the number of people actually selling and buying. The likes of Openfield would work better if:
1) Farmers would committ all their grain every year,
2) The seller and merchant worked together with better cashflow planning and storage to maximise the grain that was able to be held, and reduced the need for any forced selling.
Not going to happen, hence we will aways be the weakest link in the supply chain.
Who has the least market power?
Understand that, but doesn't that bring about the barley weasel warning of 3 multinationals, one price, and a take it or leave it ?the issue for me is risk, I simply cannot afford for a merchant to go bust on me, its a single biggest risk to my business
so when I can get the same price from a rock solid international blue chip merchant why on earth would I risk trading with a local trader or family business ?
Its sad I know but taking that risk just so I can say I support small business would be crazy
Understand that, but doesn't that bring about the barley weasel warning of 3 multinationals, one price, and a take it or leave it ?
Our business works on the same theory Clive. We only deal with companies that we can insure our trading risk against, anyone we can't insure against that wants to purchase our wares we will deal with on a pro-forma basis only.indeed it does but I cant afford the risk just to keep the little guys in business.
Our business works on the same theory Clive. We only deal with companies that we can insure our trading risk against, anyone we can't insure against that wants to purchase our wares we will deal with on a pro-forma basis only.
Companies House data is always out of date but good for building a picture up over the years, so we stick to the multinationals too, we get better prices consistently, we get paid on time and we get sensible movement. Occasionally there are some loads right roll but it happens, the merchant isn't in control of the end user, it happens.
[QUOTE="Daniel, post: 4803770, member: 315"As discussed elsewhere over the years I still keep returning to the idea of home milling feed and buying the grain from local smaller farms, i'd need 1000t delivered equally through the year, so not a massive amount in some senses but there are still a few farms round here growing 50-100ac or so of wheat on council tenancies, so it would be a good fit with them you'd think. Especially if our poultry numbers increase in the medium term and possibly you could develop a machinery sharing aspect.
I think it needs a solid pricing agreement that hedges risk for both sides. Ideally you'd take the average price from August-July and pay that, but you wouldn't know what the average was until the July so it would need a degree of trust and a balancing payment?