Interesting. Riparian landowners have a legal duty to accept flow from upstream and pass it downstream without significant material change as the foundation of English land drainage law. Unless they can clearly prove that their actions have not cause flooding (and economic loss) on the part of another landowner they would be hard put to defence a legal action for damages.Near here a wildlife trust has spent a lot of time over the last 20 years damming a local river, a new local landowner has now come along and dragged all the dams out from his side. He has dredged probably a mile of river back to its proper shape. There is talk of legal action, but he is in a position to take it on the chin.
They have no DUTY to act so are not liable.It’s time the insurance company’s started to claim of the ea,most if not all the recent flooding can be put down to their negligence
They have no DUTY to act so are not liable.
Their only legal DUTY is to "have an overview of flood risks" and to "operate a flood warning service". Everything else is optional in law.
If they have no duty to protect from flooding why do I get a letter from them once a year demanding money in the form of drainage rates?They have no DUTY to act so are not liable.
Their only legal DUTY is to "have an overview of flood risks" and to "operate a flood warning service". Everything else is optional in law.
You pay drainage rates to the EA? ?If they have no duty to protect from flooding why do I get a letter from them once a year demanding money in the form of drainage rates?
Will look for it laterYou pay drainage rates to the EA? ?
Can you post a photo of their latest demand please? I know IDB's are funded by direct drainage rates but, unless the funding rules have changed since I left in December 2014, the EA drainage work is funded from the council tax precept (maintenance) or central government grant (capital works).
I'm happy to be corrected, just interested.
You pay drainage rates to the EA? ?
Can you post a photo of their latest demand please? I know IDB's are funded by direct drainage rates but, unless the funding rules have changed since I left in December 2014, the EA drainage work is funded from the council tax precept (maintenance) or central government grant (capital works).
I'm happy to be corrected, just interested.
The Environment Agency also provides a flood warning service and manages the risks presented by coastal erosion. General Drainage Charges are payable even if land is not near to a river or the coast and are charged at a uniform rate per hectare in the area of each Regional Flood and Coastal Committee.1 Apr 2016
General Drainage Charges - CLA
https://www.cla.org.uk › default › files › Eastern › GDC Charges 2016 - 2017
Thank you both.Drainage charges for occupiers of land in the Anglian area
Check if you need to pay drainage charges, how much they are and how to pay.www.gov.uk
Yes, we pay the EA general drainage charge on areas outside the IDB which is typically land over a certain height.
That’s saved me going back to the office to try and find it . I am not aware of any way of seeing what the ea plans to do with the money,the idb do a great job and imho they should have charge over all the rivers in our area,the ea are just not fit for purpose anymore
I believe, where there is an IDB they collect the EA precept. For the isle of Sheppey this precept is about 50% of their incomeThank you both.
That only applies in Anglian Region then according to that document. I have only worked in Thames Region and, whilst aware of the role of IDB's (which Thames Region does not have) have never paid such a charge in my capacity as a land owner nor even heard of such a charge.
Does the guidance include any opportunity to scrutinise maintenance plans? If not then I consider it fails the long established principle of "no taxation without representation".
Best kept local otherwise the money would disappear corruptly like now be used for political gainMaybe we need a national idb??????????????
I cannot agree with you more about the EA when it comes to water management
The watercourse management plans are published every year:That’s saved me going back to the office to try and find it . I am not aware of any way of seeing what the ea plans to do with the money,the idb do a great job and imho they should have charge over all the rivers in our area,the ea are just not fit for purpose anymore
You pay drainage rates to the EA? ?
Can you post a photo of their latest demand please? I know IDB's are funded by direct drainage rates but, unless the funding rules have changed since I left in December 2014, the EA drainage work is funded from the council tax precept (maintenance) or central government grant (capital works).
I'm happy to be corrected, just interested.
I believe, where there is an IDB they collect the EA precept. For the isle of Sheppey this precept is about 50% of their income