Honest john
Member
- Location
- Fenland
Dont think the deal is actually done yet.
Yes so I understand, The Donald indicated he was looking at it positively.
Dont think the deal is actually done yet.
Two senior generals witnessed him. Would you call two top US generals pr**k
Well she wouldn't retire. And will history when written applaud her period in tenure but say she was selfish in not going sooner when a more moderate judge could have been appointed by Obama. Now it is Trumps call. I have no idea but be fascinating to watch the next few days to see what Trump does.
View attachment 908443
Good point, hadn't thought about it like that.
Perhaps she thought Hillary was a dead cert so she thought she would have a few more years?
Why are those that call the shots in America all so bloody old?
No, not true. Mitch McConnell said no S C J should be appointed in an election year.Obama clearly thought he had done such a great job, that the Demarcates were a shoe in, so he left the Judge positions open for his goddess Clinton.
Big mistake huge !
Obama didnt have one of the houses ,republicans do have both required to nominate ,there was no point obama nominating it would of got turned down ,a nomination just now has a fair chance of suceedingNo, not true. Mitch McConnell said no S C J should be appointed in an election year.
Now a Republican President wants to appoint one, suddenly , its OK.
fudgeing hypocrite
This doesn't change the fact that he said no S C J should be nominated in an election year.Obama didnt have one of the houses ,republicans do have both required to nominate ,there was no point obama nominating it would of got turned down ,a nomination just now has a fair chance of suceeding
I agree, but at the same time Obama nominated a judge in his last year as president, but is now saying that Don has to wait until after the election - so also a hypocrite ?No, not true. Mitch McConnell said no S C J should be appointed in an election year.
Now a Republican President wants to appoint one, suddenly , its OK.
fudgeing hypocrite
Because McConnel said he had to waitI agree, but at the same time Obama nominated a judge in his last year as president, but is now saying that Don has to wait until after the election - so also a hypocrite ?
Because McConnel said he had to wait
Merrick Garland Supreme Court nomination - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Because its after the fact.but he wanted to do it and thought it was the right thing to do, so why does he now think it is wrong for Donald to do it?
Bit childish isn’t it? I wasn’t allowed so you shouldn’t be.Because its after the fact.
No, not true. Mitch McConnell said no S C J should be appointed in an election year.
Now a Republican President wants to appoint one, suddenly , its OK.
fudgeing hypocrite
There is a list online of dozens of senators saying that the SCJ should not be appointed in an election year. How many of these have changed their minds suddenly I wonder?
This doesn't change the fact that he said no S C J should be nominated in an election year.
The 116th congress has the Democrats holding the house