Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
ELMS: Parliamentary call for evidence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delilah" data-source="post: 7766592" data-attributes="member: 76758"><p><a href="https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-environmental-land-management-scheme/" target="_blank">https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-environmental-land-management-scheme/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>Report conclusions</em></strong></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Defra and its delivery partners have worked hard in challenging circumstances to design ELM within the planned timescales. However, important elements are not yet in place, creating risks to environmental outcomes and value for money. ELM is not yet underpinned by a strong set of objectives and Defra’s planning is too short‑term in its focus. Defra also has considerable work to do to ensure ELM is delivered in a cost-effective way including developing its approach to controlling fraud and error and to delivering cost savings.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Achieving the environmental outcomes from ELM depends on high levels of participation. Defra has improved its engagement with farmers, but it still has a lot to do to regain their trust. The late introduction of SFI2022 created additional pressures for Defra and its delivery partners and, to help manage these, Defra has since reduced its scope. Nevertheless, important risks remain and a successful launch of SFI2022 to tens of thousands of farmers will be critical to the ultimate delivery of the intended environmental outcomes.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delilah, post: 7766592, member: 76758"] [URL]https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-environmental-land-management-scheme/[/URL] [B][I]Report conclusions[/I][/B] [I] Defra and its delivery partners have worked hard in challenging circumstances to design ELM within the planned timescales. However, important elements are not yet in place, creating risks to environmental outcomes and value for money. ELM is not yet underpinned by a strong set of objectives and Defra’s planning is too short‑term in its focus. Defra also has considerable work to do to ensure ELM is delivered in a cost-effective way including developing its approach to controlling fraud and error and to delivering cost savings. Achieving the environmental outcomes from ELM depends on high levels of participation. Defra has improved its engagement with farmers, but it still has a lot to do to regain their trust. The late introduction of SFI2022 created additional pressures for Defra and its delivery partners and, to help manage these, Defra has since reduced its scope. Nevertheless, important risks remain and a successful launch of SFI2022 to tens of thousands of farmers will be critical to the ultimate delivery of the intended environmental outcomes.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
ELMS: Parliamentary call for evidence
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top