- Location
- Ceredigion
What's the net return on energy counting everything right down to the quad bike that uses fuel to spread slug pellets
You'll need to do your individual per farm/per business annual fuel usage calculations I guess to find that out.What's the net return on energy counting everything right down to the quad bike that uses fuel to spread slug pellets
You'll need to do your individual per farm/per business annual fuel usage calculations I guess to find that out.
Carbon footprint calculations and how your going to reduce it or we will Penalise you possibly !Coming to a Farm Assurance Scheme near you real soon....
So how do the experts work it out . When they calculate burning straw for electric. Do they work out the growing costs trasport and loading costs and the air pollution that generatesYou'll need to do your individual per farm/per business annual fuel usage calculations I guess to find that out.
And how do you split those GHG impacts between the grain and the straw?So how do the experts work it out . When they calculate burning straw for electric. Do they work out the growing costs trasport and loading costs and the air pollution that generates
So how do the experts work it out . When they calculate burning straw for electric. Do they work out the growing costs trasport and loading costs and the air pollution that generates
You would have to calculate from balingAnd how do you split those GHG impacts between the grain and the straw?
So you weren't playing Devil's Advocate?
We either try to wean ourselves off fossil fuels or we don't. I have big issues with the whole climate change bandwagon but I do believe that merrily digging fossil fuels up to burn is on borrowed time, and some of the reasons to stop it are sensible and hold some scientific logic.
Because it’s about more than economics.But the infrastructure for oil already exists on a huge scale and its a well refined process. Why add ethanol to it which cant compete economically?
Economics would be fine if we properly accounted for the indirect costs instead of just calling them "externalities" and omitting them.Because it’s about more than economics.
Because it’s about more than economics.
I think we will make a TFF infographic about this
This is the problem with so much of what we make and do- no proper and full accounting. We can print all the money we like, but if the planet is f****d, it’s not much use! Some (many) people just can’t see beyond the £s, $s and €s.Economics would be fine if we properly accounted for the indirect costs instead of just calling them "externalities" and omitting them.
Factor in a reasonable cost for the impact of the environmental damage done by the oil and gas industries and suddenly they don't look so cheap.
It's our economic model that's broken.