Farm subsidies.. Yay or nay

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
This is exactly the problem.
Ive read on TFF many times posts bemoaning the millennials as the ‘entitlement’ generation and those who claim social services support as public purse parasites.
My observation and experience is that some in agriculture are actually far worse as they not only get funded for doing nothing but feel entitled to be so for some odd reason. The only sensible and sustainable way subsidy can continue will have to be results based, wether production or environmental. Personally I can’t see subsidy continuing for any private enterprises if we want to maintain public services as they currently exist.
child production that's a private enterprise yes you are correct the subs should stop (y)
that should save a quid or two :D
 

ajd132

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Suffolk
This is exactly the problem.
Ive read on TFF many times posts bemoaning the millennials as the ‘entitlement’ generation and those who claim social services support as public purse parasites.
My observation and experience is that some in agriculture are actually far worse as they not only get funded for doing nothing but feel entitled to be so for some odd reason. The only sensible and sustainable way subsidy can continue will have to be results based, wether production or environmental. Personally I can’t see subsidy continuing for any private enterprises if we want to maintain public services as they currently exist.
I find it very odd that one generation like to basically blame their children for everything. Weird attitude.
They should really be apologising to us millennials for ruining the economy and causing catastrophic global warming
 

Dave645

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
N Lincs
7674E5B1-ECE5-4B98-911A-B3592D9FEDDE.jpeg
This says it all. The full article as shared earlier in the thread.
https://assets.publishing.service.g...-bill-evidence-slide-pack-direct-payments.pdf

Basicly the top 10% get over £185k each that’s 8500 farmers getting close to 825million
While the small farmers The bottom third 28,333 get less than 5k so less than £141 million, between them.
No wonder the big have been getting bigger at the expence of family farms.
The system needs turning on its head to make it work the other way around. Bring people back on the land.
I do think that farming, especially in bad years needs support, but not the current blanket system.
I think the industry needs management as much as money, over production is our enemy, if we took the farming budget and took off £650 million and used that to get new entrants into the industry and helped diversify production into imported foods then, we as an industry would be better off.
We need help identifying our over production and with taking control of the markets as much as possible. It’s not market control more production control. What’s the point of exporting at a loss for any farmer.
The British public have been supportive of British farmers, but the supermarkets haven’t been.
Maybe, Make supermarkets stock as much British food as imported, the times I visit the meat counter and can struggle to find British meat on the main shelf areas.
 

Attachments

  • F120CB9B-B5A4-48ED-A66B-5B980F47C080.jpeg
    F120CB9B-B5A4-48ED-A66B-5B980F47C080.jpeg
    177.3 KB · Views: 27

7610 super q

Never Forgotten
Honorary Member
View attachment 810522 This says it all. The full article as shared earlier in the thread.
https://assets.publishing.service.g...-bill-evidence-slide-pack-direct-payments.pdf

Basicly the top 10% get over £185k each that’s 8500 farmers getting close to 825million
While the small farmers The bottom third 28,333 get less than 5k so less than £141 million, between them.
No wonder the big have been getting bigger at the expence of family farms.
The system needs turning on its head to make it work the other way around. Bring people back on the land.
I do think that farming, especially in bad years needs support, but not the current blanket system.
I think the industry needs management as much as money, over production is our enemy, if we took the farming budget and took off £650 million and used that to get new entrants into the industry and helped diversify production into imported foods then, we as an industry would be better off.
We need help identifying our over production and with taking control of the markets as much as possible. It’s not market control more production control. What’s the point of exporting at a loss for any farmer.
The British public have been supportive of British farmers, but the supermarkets haven’t been.
Maybe, Make supermarkets stock as much British food as imported, the times I visit the meat counter and can struggle to find British meat on the main shelf areas.
Top post. I'm not fused whether we get subs, or not, or who gets what per say, but if the original aim of the CAP was to keep folks on the land, it's failed miserably. If it had been capped both ways, £100k tops, and £25k bottom, then we wouldn't have lost 52% of farmers since 1972.
It doesn't sit right with me either that those that get the most dictate that the system continues ( anti Brexit ) , or worse, lobbies to change the system to their advantage, as happened in 2004-05 when NFU Wales lobbied Welsh MP's to get WAG to use the historic scheme. f**king disgraceful.
 

fgc325j

Member
Top post. I'm not fused whether we get subs, or not, or who gets what per say, but if the original aim of the CAP was to keep folks on the land, it's failed miserably. If it had been capped both ways, £100k tops, and £25k bottom, then we wouldn't have lost 52% of farmers since 1972.
It doesn't sit right with me either that those that get the most dictate that the system continues ( anti Brexit ) , or worse, lobbies to change the system to their advantage, as happened in 2004-05 when NFU Wales lobbied Welsh MP's to get WAG to use the historic scheme. fudgeing disgraceful.

I remember when the SFP started, in 2005/6, that several advisers said that farmer's "should bank
the SFP and farm without it". Playing Devil's Advocate i would argue that these farmer's should now have
a v. large sum in their bank accounts, and even at pee-poor interest paid out these days, should have a nice
cushion when the new environmental payments come in, which, from the few postings on here, suggest that
farmers will receive half what they are getting now. Of course those farmers who invested their SFP off-farm,
BTL etc, they will be able to weather the storm from the new scheme very well.
 

rich75

New Member
I remember when the SFP started, in 2005/6, that several advisers said that farmer's "should bank
the SFP and farm without it". Playing Devil's Advocate i would argue that these farmer's should now have
a v. large sum in their bank accounts, and even at pee-poor interest paid out these days, should have a nice
cushion when the new environmental payments come in, which, from the few postings on here, suggest that
farmers will receive half what they are getting now. Of course those farmers who invested their SFP off-farm,
BTL etc, they will be able to weather the storm from the new scheme very well.
What have you done with your Sfp?
Mine payed the rent.
The only one's who would of banked there's would more likely been land owners.
 

fgc325j

Member
What have you done with your Sfp?
Mine payed the rent.
The only one's who would of banked there's would more likely been land owners.

My SFP is under 15K, and over the last few years, since i've been approaching 60, a larger
%age is being invested off-farm in order to provide a passive income when i'm "older". I
don't bulls**t myself that in a few years time that i will have the "get up and go" i used to
have.
 

fgc325j

Member
My SFP is under 15K, and over the last few years, since i've been approaching 60, a larger
%age is being invested off-farm in order to provide a passive income when i'm "older". I
don't bullpoo myself that in a few years time that i will have the "get up and go" i used to
have.

I apologise - i typed in bull***t not bullpooo_O
 

Davy_g

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Co Down
How do they induce over production . Take away the smaller family farms and they will be taken over by the bigger farming companies, who will look to produce from every acre.

Farmers can and do work for a loss due to subsidies producing beef that suppresses the market.
If you take away subs then there would be a dramatic reduction in supply. Supply would in time balance with demand at a fair market price.
 

Top Tip.

Member
Location
highland
I don’t think anyone has stated the fact that the reason for subsidies is to supply cheap food to the masses,in this respect i would say they have been very successful and any government that removed them would really be playing with fire.
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
Lots of talk about no till being the best funded, but I've yet to see any decent proposals by the powers that be. It's not a magic bullet & simply does not suit all farms.

Gove has already back traced on supporting farms that increase soil organic matter, mostly on the basis of unreliable testing methods.
Researchers can't agree a single, clear, affordably measurable definition of soil health so what chance has DEFRA /RPA got?
 
https://assets.publishing.service.g...-bill-evidence-slide-pack-direct-payments.pdf

DEFRA articles showing the glorious benefits of removing subsidies (aka taking money from the farmers)

Don’t get me wrong i’m sure they will put measures in place to protect markets. Environmental schemes will be flooded with incentives.

But its when the reports (written by experts apparently) say things like better business planning will make up for subsidy loss, less use of antibiotics, diversifying more....

Most farmers are already doing all they can.... but the response from policy seems to be work harder... madness
its complete ignorance from the government, why dont they lower the uk minimum wage and tell the public to be more efficient with their expenditure
 

Two Tone

Member
Mixed Farmer
are our suppliers all getting rich? from what i see farm supply companies/machinery dealers have tight margins too and the minimum wage of their staff wont drop supposing farmers subs are scrapped what is it now near 9/hr?
I find myself reluctant to go to my tractor main dealers more and more.
It annoys me that every time I go, they give the impression that they want to deal with bigger and bigger farmers. The yard is stuffed full of tractors and machinery that is far too big for us.
On top of which, I know the owner spends an absolute fortune on shooting each winter. No wonder he shut down all but 2 of his depots.

Why have they got like this? Because they want your subsidy money.

Further encouraged by the manufacturers building bigger and bigger kit with gizmos that aren’t needed, attempting to fool us all that we cannot be efficient if we don’t have them.

The times I have heard recently that a farmer couldn’t drill because his self steering developed a fault. What the feck is wrong with his arms and the steering wheel?
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 103 40.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.5%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.3%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 12 4.7%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,483
  • 28
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top