Tarw Coch
Member
- Location
- Bottom of Wats Dyke
And she drives a ValtraPhooooaaarrrr.....love to be disciplined by her [emoji7]
And she drives a ValtraPhooooaaarrrr.....love to be disciplined by her [emoji7]
Whoa, steady there. Local girl, you may know her dad!Phooooaaarrrr.....love to be disciplined by her [emoji7]
12v or 240 ?
haha yes, I did live & work there for 3 years.
just never could get my head around the whole footpath & right of way thing
12v or 240 ?
My neighbour, fantastic girl!Phooooaaarrrr.....love to be disciplined by her [emoji7]
This winter the footpaths across my wheat fields are getting very wide, they look a bit like this:
https://www.fwi.co.uk/news/farmer-counts-cost-after-walkers-stray-from-footpath
View attachment 932828
(picture taken from farmers weekly website, all rights reserved etc by them)
maybe mine are not that wide (yet), but way wider than a normal year.
Footpaths are such a nightmare in so many ways, especially when they go diagonally across arable ground, like ours do.
What are you suppose to do about it?
Cos it's wet, they walk on the edge of the path on the wheat, forever making it wider and wider.
Even wider on the next field by the look of it4 people wide nowView attachment 943244
Yep,it’s slowed them down a bit,but they keep on coming.Even wider on the next field by the look of it
You DIRTY old man!! (Fight you for it!!)Phooooaaarrrr.....love to be disciplined by her [emoji7]
You need a bit of poultry poop off your neighbour.4 people wide nowView attachment 943244
a lot of footpaths were the routes used by the rural postmen, and they did go across the middle of a field, if that was the quickest route to the next farm or deliveryThat's as maybe, but the farmer in the past decided to pull up the grass path, fill in the ditch and grub up the hedge. Very unlikely that the path went across a field in the past!
ELMS needs to solve this issue by permissive access and government need to make it easier to divert existing cross field prows. So long as the alternative route provides a better Public Good, i cant see many objections (apart from Ramblers, who often are pragmatic if the new access is better than the existing
Not just postman, folk going to work, town, pubs etc, it was all about the shortest route from A to B when the only form of transport for many ordinary folk was on foota lot of footpaths were the routes used by the rural postmen, and they did go across the middle of a field, if that was the quickest route to the next farm or delivery
The next field had pig muck spread on it for a week,some kept to the path,a lot just walked in the surrounding wheat fieldswhen I ploughed the field even the seagulls and crows couldn’t settle.At least we won’t need any bird scarers when I plant itYou need a bit of poultry poop off your neighbour.
Fields by Hag...got serious slurry treatment in December. Apparently pooch owners didn’t like green sludge That steadied the flow of people for a while, but now they drive and park instead.
Every single path we have cross fields apart from one and they would have to swim the river if that one did, we have maps going back to 1700 and fields haven't changed, the paths go A to B the fields are shaped other reasonsThat's as maybe, but the farmer in the past decided to pull up the grass path, fill in the ditch and grub up the hedge. Very unlikely that the path went across a field in the past!
ELMS needs to solve this issue by permissive access and government need to make it easier to divert existing cross field prows. So long as the alternative route provides a better Public Good, i cant see many objections (apart from Ramblers, who often are pragmatic if the new access is better than the existing