Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Machinery
Machinery
Ford Ranger - age or mileage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MisterRob" data-source="post: 7797273" data-attributes="member: 163523"><p>I'm from NZ so it takes a bit to compute the different metrics haha.</p><p>The lower mileage 3.2 would be my pick. At the rate you use it you could own it 4 years to be the same as the biturbo miles. And there's bugger all difference between px2 and px3 rangers that makes them that much more desirable aside from the daytime lights and pushbutton start (well obviously in the case the engine is too haha). </p><p></p><p>I've owned a 3.2 myself and I've driven the new bi-turbo. The 2l is the better engine and drivetrain stock, but I'd be weary of the longevity of it all. </p><p>My 3.2 was remapped and was fantastic for towing, I couldn't easily get the same gains by remapping the 2l so it put me off buying a new one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MisterRob, post: 7797273, member: 163523"] I'm from NZ so it takes a bit to compute the different metrics haha. The lower mileage 3.2 would be my pick. At the rate you use it you could own it 4 years to be the same as the biturbo miles. And there's bugger all difference between px2 and px3 rangers that makes them that much more desirable aside from the daytime lights and pushbutton start (well obviously in the case the engine is too haha). I've owned a 3.2 myself and I've driven the new bi-turbo. The 2l is the better engine and drivetrain stock, but I'd be weary of the longevity of it all. My 3.2 was remapped and was fantastic for towing, I couldn't easily get the same gains by remapping the 2l so it put me off buying a new one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Machinery
Machinery
Ford Ranger - age or mileage
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top