I've been thinking about this; it's true that my family members mostly tended to clan together - those that know me, may know most are still working in a farm business started in 1927 by my grandfather - and leaving it was strongly discouraged (along the lines of "you stupid bastrad, you're too stupid to farm on your own, because you're stupid AND you're a bastrad, now pick up that hoe and get back to work, you stupid bastrad, etc etc") so that everyone was biased against setting up on one's own.
Looking back, I s'pose that by successfully setting up on my own, twice, I've somewhat pee'd up the family trouser leg.
But there's more to it than that - has anyone else been brought up to feel, and be, responsible for other family members, just 'cos they're disadvantaged? It's taken me most of my adult life to get rid of that burdensome feeling of obligation which, I now realise, wasn't normal. Or sustainable - the more you give, the more they want off you.
Or is it just me?
Oh yes. Family story from many years ago.
One brother earned £20 a week, the other £15. The higher earner was told to hand over £2.50 a week to other one to make it fair.
Who says farmers aren't socialists?