- Location
- Shropshire
They're doing a pretty good job of arguing we don't need proper foodHard to argue we don't need medicines though.
Frivolous use of carbon is where we should be pointing our magnifying glass.
They're doing a pretty good job of arguing we don't need proper foodHard to argue we don't need medicines though.
Frivolous use of carbon is where we should be pointing our magnifying glass.
It doesn’t matter whether cattle in this country are stood on top of a hill, grazing a river meadow, housed in a concrete shed or a suite at the Ritz, official Government figures put ALL of agricultures contributions to emissions at 10%, so cattle, however they are kept are not a problem, especially as they are part of a completely natural cycle that has been around for several millennia without causing the imminent end of life as we know it.
So, please, no more manly arguments about ”mines better than yours, because….”, cows are not the problem, simple message, we just need to stick to it, loud and proud, keep hammering that home ad nauseum, no apologising, grovelling and hand-wringing like our great leaders are wont to do. Cows are not the problem.
It's not just the BBC. On ITV this morning Susana Reed and Rich and Madeley were picking out beef and dairy using worldwide figures, not UK.About time someone stood up for us livestock farmers with some truer figures.
I'm fed up with alll the complete rubbish of information peddled by the plant based loving BBC and the holier than holy vegan brain washed morons.
I do wonder if the fossil fuel industries are also peddling the miss-information about meat eating, just to take the attention away from them.
I keep saying it's not just the effing BBC, it's every media outlet everywhere.It's not just the BBC. On ITV this morning Susana Reed and Rich and Madeley were picking out beef and dairy using worldwide figures, not UK.
That's precisely what you did with your concrete systems are finished post.Do we really want farmers competing against each other trying to prove who has the greenest system?
It seems every BBC post that actually makes some valid intelligent comments about farming has a bit at the end that goes against what they're just said. It's as if the editors say yes we'll run the story, very well done journalist. And then when the author toddles off smiling they stick their own little bit on the end to invalidate the whole thing.How the rich are driving climate change
The world's wealthiest people make a huge contribution to climate change through carbon-hungry activities. How can we reduce emissions from the rich?www.bbc.com
Was amazed to see this on the bbc news website, then read it and they manage to squeeze in a 'meat is bad' mention as well...
No. So why are you doing so?In some countries they do yes. I'm not saying its wrong to house cattle, I'm saying if you only put half the story out there it will get picked apart and debunked at which point people will just think farmers lie all the time.
Promoting grass fed beef damages the reputation of other methods.
Do we really want farmers competing against each other trying to prove who has the greenest system?
Hard to argue we don't need food to a far higher degree. An order of magnitude more vital in fact.Hard to argue we don't need medicines though.
Frivolous use of carbon is where we should be pointing our magnifying glass.
Haven't seen the green graphic before, very good visual, saved it now thanks. It's a strange thread that. Lots of good points but far too long and complicated to keep the attention of the average member of the public. In fact it goes on for quite a while restating the exact stuff that is used to hoodwink people before then starting to explain why it's more complicated than it first appears. Attention span. It also has some strange links given over to certain misinformation. He really needs to look at it again and trim it down. Quite why he included the g of protein per calorie graphic I've no idea. It's a daft way to look at food precisely because of the cyclical nature of ruminant methane never mind various other problems relating to food quality and nutritional value of foods that promote insulin resistance rather than health benefits.Joe Stanlay has a great thread on twitter. See below:
Thread by @JoeWStanley on Thread Reader App
Thread by @JoeWStanley: We need to talk about 🐂 cows 💨 carbon 🔥 climate change & #COP26 1/🧵 Climate change is happening. The world has warmed >1°c since the mid-C18th as a result of the anthropogenic...…threadreaderapp.com
100% agree.Arm yourselves with facts and figures by all means, we should all know how to counter some of the dubious but oft repeated nonsense that is chucked our way, and draw attention to the failings of others if you must, but the best advertising campaigns are the simplest, beanz meanz Heinz, not, our beans are the best because they grow in fairy dust watered by unicorn tears, and our competitors are not so they’re rubbish.
Himself across the room from me has read out to me something he’s just found on the bbc website, it’s about a lady from Leeds that joined a local climate change group to learn how to do her bit to help. The main thing she learnt and the only thing she has done so far to help the planet? she has stopped eating red meat. As she says, she never realised before that cows and sheep in a field were doing so much damage to the planet.
I bet my last rolo, that if you asked the lady from Leeds, and millions more like her, how ruminants are destroying the planet, most people would be a bit vague as to the exact problem, ”umm, they fart, or something, or drink too much water, and all their food comes from the Amazon, dunno really, but that bloke was on the tele again about it, or it might of been on Facebook, or that actress on the radio, somebody is always going on about it”.
COWS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM, this is all we need to tell the lady from Leeds and millions like her, constantly, now and forevermore, if we have to back it up with fact and figures , then no problem, we can, but we are far too late to the party with the simple truth, COWS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM.