But we pay membership fees to them already...But (as ever a but so do not read on!) these organisations to an extent rely/are a conduit for the AHDB funds. One can argue the AHDB do not channel funds correctly. My thoughts so pretty irrelevant really - first, NIAB have members funds but these are trivial compared to the funds available to distributors and manufacturers. Second, CMI? do they actually do any trials? genuine question as I have no involvement - thought CMI reinterpreted others published trial data. Third, ADAS has to get funding from somewhere such as AHDB/manufacturers as has no money of its own and is not at all like the ADAS/NAAS of the 1970/80s when MAFF kept it well fed with money to undertake research whether farmers wanted it or not.
My view - AHDB is in effect a conduit for that part of the levy money fed into research. More of the money is spent elsewhere over which I will not comment. If AHDB levy is terminated (as I consider there could be a groundswell of support for) then how do you/we the industry propose to fund the organisations you quote? Membership fees?
Regards,