In what region?
Looks like the Grand Canyon...
In what region?
But it's only one fat lamb.
No doubt my landlords will only hear the +£20 bit even though they don't put on any fertiliser!
heard some grazing marshes made £170/ac
Same here.
Rent increases year on year, whilst ignoring the ground needs limed, there's fences starting to need repaired (rotten posts) and there's a burst drain in the middle of the 'cropping' field meaning it can only be grazed and 1/2ac is a boggy waste...
They did @spin cycle but it is not farmers underwriting the cost for marshes but the charities. One or two charities are taking thousands of acres out of production by offering £100-140 an acre and that is then squeezing the demand for livestock grazing land (i.e. animals that will be eaten or bred from) and farmers are having to pay over the odds as there are fewer acres on offer. Obviously the charities and their supporters aim is to stop the public eating meat and they seem to have realised that they can further their cause by outbidding for the grazing.
My personal gripe is that non farming landowners are claiming SFP and then renting land to a charity that is not involved in food production.
Seriously? Are we talking vegan type charities or just the badger huggers? They'll be in for a shock when they realise just how much land they're going to have to rent to stop meat production.
No, you are definitely not alone!Not just me then! I hate to turn land down when it's on my own doorstep but there comes a point when it's more hassle than its worth.
It's ridiculous trade. I can't understand it at all.
Land owners are in for a bloody big shock when subs go
In for a bigger one when the tories go and Corbyn rides into Downing Street all guns blazing.
Hahahaha. That will never happen as long as I've a hole in my arse.
Labour will win the next election... not even this war can save May and the Tories.
They did @spin cycle but it is not farmers underwriting the cost for marshes but the charities. One or two charities are taking thousands of acres out of production by offering £100-140 an acre and that is then squeezing the demand for livestock grazing land (i.e. animals that will be eaten or bred from) and farmers are having to pay over the odds as there are fewer acres on offer. Obviously the charities and their supporters aim is to stop the public eating meat and they seem to have realised that they can further their cause by outbidding for the grazing.
My personal gripe is that non farming landowners are claiming SFP and then renting land to a charity that is not involved in food production.
Or better to do as you did and sell some sheep?People are desperate.
I have spare grass at home as thanks to the RPA underpaying (but naturally Ill count as paid for their statistics) Ive had to sell off ewes over winter.
I was expecting to let the good Ley ground at 50p/ewe+ lambs and the PP at 30p/ per week but Have had flat out offers of £1+ and one guy offering £100/ac for the 4 months on offer.
ALL of them were desperate, all coming from further up the valleys and some from 25-30 miles away, all without grass at home and forage, and some of the sheep look pretty poor, living on what little they can find grazing and concentrate. it will return to normal soon enough when grass grows at home - A ewe breaking even on away grazing is better than a starved ewe going into summer with stunted lambs and needing TLC to get reading for next tupping.
They probably will. But Corbyn won't be PM.
If Labour do win it will be testament to the absolute stunning incompetence of the May government.
I grabbed this of one of our local charities to give you a taste of their stance. I took their name out though!
We have always known that one of the main reasons animals are left to suffer in factory farms is because people have little or no idea about the immense cruelty involved in their food production. Although most of our rescued animals have been saved from the farming industry, @@@@@ is also home to nearly 2000 horses, ponies, donkeys and mules.