House of Lords enquiry into future land use policy

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
The HoL are running an enquiry into future land use policy. I strongly suggest we all look to submit evidence on at least the points around future farm land use policy


Aim of the inquiry

The House of Lords Select Committee on Land Use in England was appointed in January 2022. It is chaired by Lord Cameron of Dillington. The Committee is required to agree its report by the end of November 2022.

Over the course of its inquiry, the Committee will be undertaking a wide-ranging study of all aspects of land use in England, the policies which govern them, the short and longer-term outlook for how land use may change and may need to change, and the most appropriate response to these changes. Within this study we will be considering the role of the key drivers of land use change including climate change, biodiversity decline, population and economic growth, and the extent of their influence.

Most importantly, the Committee will be looking at how the Government can best develop a strategy to plan for these changes, and is also keen to hear proposed solutions to current and emerging challenges. The Committee has a particular focus on integration of policies and on planning for multifunctional land use, and would especially welcome contributions on these themes.

This is a public call for written evidence to be submitted to the Committee. The deadline is 4.00pm on Tuesday 26 April 2022. You can follow the progress of the inquiry on Twitter @LordsLandCom.

All are welcome to respond to the Call for Evidence and there are no barriers to making a submission. Respondents are not obliged to respond to every question listed, and so may confine their response to their particular areas of interest or expertise as they find appropriate.

Diversity comes in many forms and hearing a range of different perspectives means that committees are better informed and can more effectively scrutinise public policy and legislation. Committees can undertake their role most effectively when they hear from a wide range of individuals, sectors or groups in society affected by a particular policy or piece of legislation. We encourage anyone with experience or expertise of an issue under investigation by a select committee to share their views with the committee, with the full knowledge that their views have value and are welcome.

Questions

The Committee is happy to receive submissions on any issues related to the subject of the inquiry but would particularly welcome submissions on the questions listed below. You do not need to address every question. Respondents may interpret the questions broadly and provide as much information as possible. Instructions on how to submit evidence are set out at the end of this document.

Pressures and challenges

1. What do you see as the most notable current challenges in relation to land use in England? How might these challenges best be tackled? How do you foresee land use in England changing over the long term? How should competing priorities for land use be managed?

2. What are the key drivers of land use change which need to be planned for, and how should they be planned for? What is the role of multifunctional land use strategies in implementing these plans?

3. How might we achieve greater and more effective coordination, integration and delivery of land use policy and management at a central, regional, local and landscape level?

Farming and land management

4. What impacts are changes to farming and agricultural practices, including food production, likely to have on land use in England? What is the role of new technology and changing standards of land management?

5. What impact are the forthcoming environmental land management schemes likely to have on agriculture, biodiversity and wellbeing? What do you see as their merits and disadvantages?


Nature, landscape and biodiversity

6. What do you see as the key threats to nature and biodiversity in England in the short and longer term, and what role should land use policy have in tackling these?

7. What are the merits and challenges of emerging policies such as nature-based solutions (including eco-system and carbon markets), local nature recovery strategies and the biodiversity net gain requirement? Are these policies compatible, and how can we ensure they support one another, and that they deliver effective benefits for nature?

Environment, climate change, energy and infrastructure

8. How will commitments such as the 25-year environment plan and the net zero target require changes to land use in England, and what other impacts might these changes have?

9. How should land use pressures around energy and infrastructure be managed?

Land use planning

10. What do you see as the advantages and disadvantages of the existing land use planning system and associated frameworks in England? How effectively does the system manage competing demands on land, including the Government’s housing and development objectives? What would be the merits of introducing a formal spatial planning framework or frameworks, and how might it be implemented?

11. What lessons may be learned from land use planning frameworks in the devolved nations and abroad, and how might these lessons apply to England?

Conclusion

12. Which organisations would be best placed to plan and decide on the allocation of land for the various competing agendas for land use in England, and how should they set about doing so?
 

JP1

Member
Livestock Farmer
I guess I'll do it. I've done two of these "call for evidence" recently ; food labelling and animal welfare in transit

The thing is, and I will tag @Janet Hughes Defra , in to this , they all take time . I mean a lot of time. Both previous ones took at least 8 hours a piece. I did them because I really care about the outcomes, practical and legal but apart from an email receipt you never hear anything more. No follow up, no updates, you don't know whether Sir Humphrey's minion has discounted or "re-weighted" your earnest reply in favour of mass carpetbagging by NGO's or big corporates

Tomorrow night after my main work and before I get home to do real farming and bottle feeding, I am on a 1 hour Zoom call with an independent research organisation giving feedback on DEFRA communications and service levels (where do you start in an hour from great with BCMS but it's being disbanded to wilfully appalling for DEFRA switchboard Liverpool).

I keep thinking "it only takes one man to make a stand, multiple times, to make a difference " but then I KNOW deep down it's a waste of time , almost as much as contacting my Brexit bought constituency MP.

The folks asking the questions have no skin in the game, no direct farming experience and if I'm honest I believe they may well care as part of their day job but all of it will get deflected by Ministerial other agendas anyway

I've seen what happens with these things elsewhere from pig sector experience; civil servants (who I am sure are diligent and good administrators) get parachuted in to deal with "policy" rammed home by Government "special advisors" . The time required to be expended to get even basic pig farming knowledge up to speed is incredible and that's before any "commitment" is made by DEFRA on what they actually will likely legislate for. Pre meetings organised by AHDB and others where "inputters" such as APHA attend Zoom meetings and don't even have the courtesy to turn their camera on .......................
 
Last edited:

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
I guess I'll do it. I've done two of these "call for evidence" recently ; food labelling and animal welfare in transit

The thing is, and I will tag @Janet Hughes Defra , in to this , they all take time . I mean a lot of time. Both previous ones took at least 8 hours a piece. I did them because I really care about the outcomes, practical and legal but apart from an email receipt you never hear anything more. No follow up, no updates, you don't know whether Sir Humphrey's minion has discounted or "re-weighted" your earnest reply in favour of mass carpetbagging by NGO's or big corporates

Tomorrow night after my main work and before I get home to do real farming and bottle feeding, I am on a 1 hour Zoom call with an independent research organisation giving feedback on DEFRA communications and service levels (where do you start in an hour from great with BCMS but it's being disbanded to wilfully appalling for DEFRA switchboard Liverpool).

I keep thinking "it only takes one man to make a stand, multiple times, to make a difference " but then I KNOW deep down it's a waste of time , almost as much as contacting my Brexit bought constituency MP.

The folks asking the questions have no skin in the game, no direct farming experience and if I'm honest I believe they may well care as part of their day job but all of it will get deflected by Ministerial other agendas anyway

I've seen what happens with these things elsewhere from pig sector experience; civil servants (who I am sure are diligent and good administrators) get parachuted in to deal with "policy" rammed home by Government "special advisors" . The time required to be expended to get even basic pig farming knowledge up to speed is incredible and that's before any "commitment" is made by DEFRA on what they actually will likely legislate for. pre meetings organised by AHDB and others where "inputters" such as APHA attend Zoom meetings and don't even have the courtesy to turn their camera on .......................
Sadly true Jeremy.

I commented earlier on the DEFRA "consultation" on their proposals to deal with the horrendous issue of sewage discharges to rivers.

The bits that I thought I really needed to comment on were not open to question (The proposed invasive new powers for these monopoly private coprorate organisations to come onto private land and change your drainage system - No details of the limits on these powers or any right to appeal) but DEFRA will still say they have "consulted" on the package.

Trust is FUNDAMENTALLY lacking in the system.
 

JP1

Member
Livestock Farmer
0959E726-B2CF-4231-ADF5-E460D592D414.jpeg
 

JP1

Member
Livestock Farmer
I've thought for some time that Neil Parrish should have had the DEFRA secretaries job instead of George Useless.
Apologies to the TFFer that actually commented recently as I cannot recall who but the point was made Neil Parrish is better off chairing the EFRA committee and holding many different department Ministers feet to the fire
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 104 40.6%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.2%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 12 4.7%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,522
  • 28
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top