Chemicals will just loose their authorisations. No police required.And where are the seed broadcasting police exactly?
Chemicals will just loose their authorisations. No police required.And where are the seed broadcasting police exactly?
Chemicals will just loose their authorisations. No police required.
And where are the seed broadcasting police exactly?
YOU’VE TOLD THEM!How will they know it’s been broadcast please?
The principle underlying the UK pesticide regulatory process is one of trust and honour from farmers.
It's certainly not science anymore.
YOU’VE TOLD THEM!
Well you know only to well there are no 'seed broadcasting police'.
The principle underlying the UK pesticide regulatory process is one of trust and honour from farmers.
Society entrusts regulators to approve pesticides on the basis of an approval. So, for example, if a label for a seed dressing were to say 'do not broadcast' then the decision is with the farmer.
But we should not be surprised to lose chemical approvals if society considers that trust has not been honoured.
I do sympathise though.
That is as maybe. But that is the reality. I consider your statement a tad reactionary, but that is by the by. Some of the science I assume you refer to has two sides to the opinion. A topic for another day.
To continue with my poor analogy, I do not agree with the 60mph speed limit on the A52 and push the boundaries regularly. Should I be annoyed if I lose my right to drive on the A52 if I exceed that limit.
.
Not no an individual basis, you just state it is widely being practiced. I don’t care whether your statement would stand up in court, nor do our detractors.Haven't told them anything have I if you re read everything.
Even if you feel you can dissect the above statement and twist it into not meaning what it first appears to say, it is an incitement which may mean others are more likely to do it.Sod the rules. Be sensible and do it. Loads are.
Not no an individual basis, you just state it is widely being practiced. I don’t care whether your statement would stand up in court, nor do our detractors.
Even if you feel you can dissect the above statement and twist it into not meaning what it first appears to say, it is an incitement which may mean others are more likely to do it.
If we abuse these products we deserve to loose them, and we will.
As an industry we have been fortunate in that our infield practice has not often been directly monitored or questioned. Don’t believe that means it is not being indirectly monitored.
Why do you need to broadcast treated seed? Farm save seed off the heap would be the thing to use if you want to broadcast.That’s a delusional view in a year like everybody is having. The next 3 month forecast is generally wet so people will do whatever they need to to survive.
The key with broadcasting is to start early enough before soil temps drop to the point where growth is very slow. Oh yes,chuck plenty of seed on as well....I could post a few pics of the broadcast wheat local to me, but don’t like to because it’s somebody else’s.
It does look remarkably good though, reasonably even, although behind what stage it usually is for the time of year.
Certainly better than everybody else’s stubble or wet cultivated land.
When its harrowed in it just the same as drilled.I’m afraid you can’t be sensible and broadcast treated seed. And if “loads are” it will only give ammunition for others to use against our industry.
When its harrowed in it just the same as drilled.
What are you harrowing with?Except the third that is left exposed on top.