If microplastics are being eaten by soil microfauna, then that's going to upset the nutritional value of the food chain, so yes, they could be.
And maybe should be researched more then, lots of "if's and maybe's" about the whole subject, ISTM....
If microplastics are being eaten by soil microfauna, then that's going to upset the nutritional value of the food chain, so yes, they could be.
Also, when it comes to research projects, for someone looking to get a Ph.D they need to have a unique thesis do they not.
There was a big discussion between the EA and the water companies earlier this year about that. The EA were talking about withdrawing the existing permits to spread iirc because of the plastic contamination.And maybe should be researched more then, lots of "if's and maybe's" about the whole subject, ISTM....
Now, if there was a smart eartag for sheep and outdoor cattle that had the capability of changing colour, or flashing a light to say its wearer has just begun feeling not all that well, with a different colour for what's wrong, I could be tempted to think about buying some.
In the dairy sector, not an ear tag, but a neck transponder on a collar. By listening to the cudding action (using small microphones), this is interpreted as a frequency and used as a back-map.
As part of the research, various animals cudding action were monitored (along with other parameters) like calving cows. in heat animals and those starting with Ketosis etc and different, but consistent patterns emerged.
These were used in a database to monitor all animals, and if they started following the frequencies of any of the above a SMS was sent to the owners mobile. This was long in advance of the animal showing symptoms.
On screen and online, an overlay would show how things are progressing and allow the owner to take action or not.
There is allot going on in the sensor market.
Review: Sensor techniques in ruminants: more than fitness trackers
In this position paper, I shall summarise the current status of sensor technologies in ruminant livestock farming with emphasis on dairy cattle, outli…www.sciencedirect.com
Is there a reason why microplastics cannot be removed? Also, if sewage sludge cannot be guaranteed free of microplastics, if the process isn't already happening, why can't it be AD'd, with solids dried and incinerated in high efficiency incinerators for more power production?
Ash, if any, going into inert blocks ~ maybe for building?
Well, the "new" regulations look to be taking the water companies in a new direction?There was a big discussion between the EA and the water companies earlier this year about that. The EA were talking about withdrawing the existing permits to spread iirc because of the plastic contamination.
Microplastics are a very big deal. Nobody knows quite what to do about it. Ban them and you kill the clothing industry dead, not to mention the impact on the water companies....
Cost, COST, COST
Cheap is good for the Shareholders. I was charring with an aquaintance this week, and said incineration would be the answer to a lot of issues with sludge. My concern lies with heavy metals still...
The metals should be recoverable, surely?
What a huge waste if it isn't done.
We are talking about microscopic fibres, invisible to the human eye. They are released from plastic clothing (basically almost everything on the high street) every time it's washed and so end up in sewage works. There's no currently economic way to remove them from the sludge and water so they are getting into rivers then seas and onto land.Is there a reason why microplastics cannot be removed? Also, if sewage sludge cannot be guaranteed free of microplastics, if the process isn't already happening, why can't it be AD'd, with solids dried and incinerated in high efficiency incinerators for more power production?
Ash, if any, going into inert blocks ~ maybe for building?
Peer reviewed has lost any useful meaning in my opinion. In many cases now it simply means that a carefully chosen selection of academics who share the views of the study team have read the report and signed it off.Most researchers I come across now are studying things which -they imply- make me and my livestock look bad/inefficient/unwanted.
And once the keen faced youth spent a few months measuring whatever it is, their professor says well done...here's your phd, this IS now the proved science.
With a bit of digging, I've noticed that the label 'peer reviewed' generally means - in this area- that one anti-farmer prof has looked at another's student's work, and said 'mmm, right on brother'.
I'm pretty sure I've witnessed exactly that....which has led to the allocation and spending of millions of ££ in public funding, based on hooeyPeer reviewed has lost any useful meaning in my opinion. In many cases now it simply means that a carefully chosen selection of academics who share the views of the study team have read the report and signed it off.
The original purpose was for the reviewers to find fault in the report to strengthen the science.
Peer reviewed has lost any useful meaning in my opinion. In many cases now it simply means that a carefully chosen selection of academics who share the views of the study team have read the report and signed it off.
The original purpose was for the reviewers to find fault in the report to strengthen the science.
The trouble is that the scientific ideal had been corrupted by corporate giants in search of profit.You will find it very difficult to borrow money to buy into new and cutting edge technology without strong peer review, or a recognised reputable institute that has carried out the research.
The drug Industry has many ' get rich quick ' investors who have the scars to prove it.