Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
I can't believe what I just read! BBC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ffermer Bach" data-source="post: 7649175" data-attributes="member: 51054"><p><em><strong>Brothers Mark and John Snell, in their 30s, used to have a dairy herd, now they rear turkeys and pigs for Pipers Farm. Mark says most would like to farm regeneratively if they could, but warns there isn't "a hope in hell" of feeding the world on it.</strong> </em></p><p></p><p>I disagree with the statement that regenerative agriculture can't feed the world, so that fellow is saying that a system that destroys the soil (and the UN thinks will only give 60 more harvests before the topsoil has been lost) is a better system to feed the world than an agricultural system then cares for and improves the top soil? The comments I have highlighted really annoy me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ffermer Bach, post: 7649175, member: 51054"] [I][B]Brothers Mark and John Snell, in their 30s, used to have a dairy herd, now they rear turkeys and pigs for Pipers Farm. Mark says most would like to farm regeneratively if they could, but warns there isn't "a hope in hell" of feeding the world on it.[/B] [/I] I disagree with the statement that regenerative agriculture can't feed the world, so that fellow is saying that a system that destroys the soil (and the UN thinks will only give 60 more harvests before the topsoil has been lost) is a better system to feed the world than an agricultural system then cares for and improves the top soil? The comments I have highlighted really annoy me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
I can't believe what I just read! BBC
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top