If a group of supplying dairy farmers to a dairy all said no red tractor now then what would the dairy do?
Go without milk?
Dairy farms probably have the most hassle and cost with it but have the best chance of grouping together to get it abolished.
@Bald Rick
RT is always on the agenda at our producer meetings.
This year there was not a squeak (in common with other years too) when it was covered off.
There are probably a number of reasons:
1) We are not directly billed for RT & "beef" assurance is automatically thrown in if you are compliant
2) It is a direct requirement of any dairy contract (& Arlagaarden goes MUCH further than RT in any case to the point where one farmer I know had to dispose of two DB tractors that wouldn't start as an "eyesore") and we would be in breach. I take the point that if we all banded together there would be little a processor could do but when have farmers ever co-operated to that extent? Divide & rule
3) It's just paperwork. We are govern by Food Standards Agency/Dairy inspection in any case so most of us will have high hygiene standards in any case. There are lots of petty things around RT but it's not difficult to suck up
4) Some measure of standardisation is not, in essence, a bad thing. RT just needs to "smell the coffee" and row back on the pettiness.
BTW, I am not an RT apologist in any way, shape or form but I have far greater things to worry about than a few hours filling in paperwork & talking to an inspector