IS GREEN RENEWABLE ENERGY A CON?

bluebell

Member
so while we have jobless areas crying out for well paid jobs such as mining, steel making etc, the govt is happy to pay or allow foreign derived wood chip to come into the country, losing out on paying our own people in deprived parts of the uk a decent wage ? yet the massive ironey that i see the pollution still comes from the burning whever it be coal or wood chips, nor alone the montrous subsity? totally out of order in my view in all counts ?
 

Lincsman

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
As I understand it Drax (and other biomass power stations) are allowed under the rules to ignore the carbon emitted because it comes from a renewable source "so doesn't count". Also any emissions created in the fuel supply before it reaches the UK are counted against the country of origin, not the UK. These seemingly crazy rules are how Drax counts as zero emissions renewable energy and qualifies for the huge subsidy it attracts.
Wasnt coal and oil wood at one point?... its renewable but takes a little longer than 150 years.
 
Last edited:
As I understand it Drax (and other biomass power stations) are allowed under the rules to ignore the carbon emitted because it comes from a renewable source "so doesn't count". Also any emissions created in the fuel supply before it reaches the UK are counted against the country of origin, not the UK. These seemingly crazy rules are how Drax counts as zero emissions renewable energy and qualifies for the huge subsidy it attracts.
Sounds fair enough to me, so the crops I feed my cows come from a renewable source and I can feed as much South American Soya and maize as I like because according to that logic any emissions growing those crops will be counted against the country of origin. Chuck in a bit of carbon sequestration on my grass land and bobs your uncle I’m carbon neutral 👍 😋
 

New Puritan

Member
Location
East Sussex
I find this thread slightly depressing. 5 pages in and nobody's mentioned all the opportunities that renewable energy might offer to farmers:

Wind turbines
Solar panels - not just on fields but on shed roofs etc.
Growing OSR for biodiesel
Growing wheat or sugarbeet for bioethanol
AD plants for muck / slurry / maize to make biomethane
Straw for electricity

And probably lots of other things not in my mind at the moment. Sure not all farmers can do all of them but that's the case with most types of farming.
 

GeorgeC1

Member
I find this thread slightly depressing. 5 pages in and nobody's mentioned all the opportunities that renewable energy might offer to farmers:

Wind turbines
Solar panels - not just on fields but on shed roofs etc.
Growing OSR for biodiesel
Growing wheat or sugarbeet for bioethanol
AD plants for muck / slurry / maize to make biomethane
Straw for electricity

And probably lots of other things not in my mind at the moment. Sure not all farmers can do all of them but that's the case with most types of farming.

Exactly
 

Donkey Oaty

Member
Location
Aberdeenshire
I find this thread slightly depressing. 5 pages in and nobody's mentioned all the opportunities that renewable energy might offer to farmers:

Wind turbines
Solar panels - not just on fields but on shed roofs etc.
Growing OSR for biodiesel
Growing wheat or sugarbeet for bioethanol
AD plants for muck / slurry / maize to make biomethane
Straw for electricity

And probably lots of other things not in my mind at the moment. Sure not all farmers can do all of them but that's the case with most types of farming.
There are lots of farmers who are investing in such, and good luck to them.
But the OP's question is are these schemes a con?
Are these alternative means of generation a step forward in terms of energy efficiency, cost and emission control? Or, are they box ticking schemes to meet a government target?
Is it Green, to transport woodchip from USA to Drax?
Is it Green to transport straw from Aberdeenshire to Lincolnshire to burn it?
Is it Green to have biomass boilers heating sheds which are only drying potatoes or bulbs part of the year?
Is it Green to take grass to an AD plant from miles around to ferment it to produce gas?

I think not, in many cases, and the public are being conned in the part of their bills they pay for renewable electricity.
 

New Puritan

Member
Location
East Sussex
There are lots of farmers who are investing in such, and good luck to them.
But the OP's question is are these schemes a con?
Are these alternative means of generation a step forward in terms of energy efficiency, cost and emission control? Or, are they box ticking schemes to meet a government target?
Is it Green, to transport woodchip from USA to Drax?
Is it Green to transport straw from Aberdeenshire to Lincolnshire to burn it?
Is it Green to have biomass boilers heating sheds which are only drying potatoes or bulbs part of the year?
Is it Green to take grass to an AD plant from miles around to ferment it to produce gas?

I think not, in many cases, and the public are being conned in the part of their bills they pay for renewable electricity.


I don't think they're a "con" as such. I do not know the specifics of some of the things in your list, but by and large people producing renewables need to be able to demonstrate that there are carbon savings from doing what they are doing. Certainly this is the case with AD plants and bioethanol/biodiesel.

Shipping bulk goods long distances by boat doesn't require as much energy as people assume.
 

thesilentone

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Cumbria
Well, I think we can establish those who have missed the renewables Klondike then.

Lots of untruth's in some of the posts and a massive lack of research.

There are several basic elements we need to sustain our way of life.

Food, Water and Fuel, the only natural one we know, is water, it falls out of the sky. We then play a hand in storing it, and distributing it around.

We produce food and fuel, which do we need the most ? Without food we die, without fuel we have no way of manufacturing and distributing food, so the same end result.

Food and Fuel and both subsidised, some twice or even multiple times depending what initiatives are about at the time.

Fossil fuels are dirty, and have huge CO2 emissions as well as several other toxics, renewables offer an alternative alongside, however it all looks rather pointless if the renewables supply chain in loaded with CO2 and exceeds that of fossil fuels.

That is why we have such things as the sustainability criteria.
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
I find this thread slightly depressing. 5 pages in and nobody's mentioned all the opportunities that renewable energy might offer to farmers:

Wind turbines
Solar panels - not just on fields but on shed roofs etc.
Growing OSR for biodiesel
Growing wheat or sugarbeet for bioethanol
AD plants for muck / slurry / maize to make biomethane
Straw for electricity

And probably lots of other things not in my mind at the moment. Sure not all farmers can do all of them but that's the case with most types of farming.

Wind turbines Agreed. Excellent technology.
Solar panels - not just on fields but on shed roofs etc. Agreed. Excellent technology.
Growing OSR for biodiesel If the OSR is grown using fossil inputs and fossil fuels are used in transporting and processing it then is it really doing any good?
Growing wheat or sugarbeet for bioethanol As above.
AD plants for muck / slurry / maize to make biomethane Using waste on farm or brought in it's a great idea. Growing feedstock crops specifically, especially using fossil derived inputs, is questionable.
Straw for electricity Shouldn't the straw be retained as a soil cover and improver really?

I'm not knocking any farm that does these things, it's simply a commercial decision, but the rules encouraging some of them are actually not compatible with the supposed outcomes being sought.
 

thesilentone

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Cumbria
Wind turbines Agreed. Excellent technology.
Solar panels - not just on fields but on shed roofs etc. Agreed. Excellent technology.
Growing OSR for biodiesel If the OSR is grown using fossil inputs and fossil fuels are used in transporting and processing it then is it really doing any good?
Growing wheat or sugarbeet for bioethanol As above.
AD plants for muck / slurry / maize to make biomethane Using waste on farm or brought in it's a great idea. Growing feedstock crops specifically, especially using fossil derived inputs, is questionable.
Straw for electricity Shouldn't the straw be retained as a soil cover and improver really?

I'm not knocking any farm that does these things, it's simply a commercial decision, but the rules encouraging some of them are actually not compatible with the supposed outcomes being sought.


What 'fossil derived inputs ' are used in AD Plants ?
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 103 40.6%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 93 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.4%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 11 4.3%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,355
  • 24
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top